why i oppose imposing a higher tax on the fast food industry
Many people deeply held the conviction that too much fast food is the prominent cause of health problems, and it is necessary for the government to take measures, like imposing a higher tax on this kind of food. But I strongly oppose this view. To illustrate my opinion, I am going to argue two aspects of this movement.
First, it is commonly acknowledged that the profit equals the incoming minus the burden including fees, prices and taxes. So as long as the tax is increased, the industry would get heavier burdens, and would create less fortune and would reduce the produce scales. Thus, there would be less job proposed and people would be out of work. It would even slow the develop speed of the whole country’s economy. So it can be easily concluded that a higher tax on fast food industry would cause great damage to the economy.
Second, imposing a higher tax is not the only way to control the consume of the fast food, there are a number of more sufficient alternatives. For example, the government should encourage people to buy more vegetables and fresh fruits by decreasing those product’s prices. Meanwhile, the cook should be responsible for creating various kinds of dished. Under such circumstances, the popularity would be willing to take these delicious and affordable ingredients home. Needless to say, it is crucial to raise the awareness of physical fitness and exercise is the most effective method to achieve this goal.
Admittedly, imposing a higher tax is one way to go, but undeniably, there are other effective and cost-efficiency options worth consideration.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 357, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ould be out of work. It would even slow the develop speed of the whole country's econo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 62, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...gher tax is not the only way to control the consume of the fast food, there are a number of...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, so, thus, while, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03370786517 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85800431081 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588014981273 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8810052616 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07142857143 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286969602976 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879957901964 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119344106654 0.0667982634062 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167436396372 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448876272249 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.