Some people argue that it is pointless to spend money on the protection of wild animas because we human have no need for them. I completely disagree with this point of view.
In my opinion, it is absurd to argue that wild animals have no place in the 21st century. I do not believe that planet Earth exists only for the benefit of humans, and there is nothing special about this century that we suddenly have the right to allow or encourage the extinction of any species. Furthermore, there is no compelling reason why we should let animals die out. We do not need to exploit or destroy every last square metre of land in order to feed or accomodate the world's population. There is a plenty of room for us to exist side by side with wild animals, and this should be our aim.
I believe that more resources should be allocated to protect wild animals. It is usually the protection of natural habitats that ensure the survival of wild animals, and most scientists agrees that these habitats are also crucial for human survival. For example, rainforests produce oxygen, absorb carbon dioxide and stabilise the Earth's climate. If we destroy these area, the cost of managing the resulting changes to our planet would far overweight the costs of conservation. By protecting wild animals and their habitats, we maintain the nature balance of all life on Earth.
In conclision, we have no right to decide whether or not wild animals should exist, and I believe that we should do everything we can to protect them.
- The pie charts below show average household expenditure in Hong Kong and Britain in the year 2000 56
- In the developed world average life expectancy is increasing What problems will this cause for individuals and society Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of ageing populations 95
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Chorleywood is a village near London whose population has increased steadily since the middle of the nineteenth century. The map below shows the development of the village. 73
- In the developed world, average life expectancy is increasing. What problems will this cause for individuals and society? Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of ageing populations. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 480, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...land in order to feed or accomodate the worlds population. There is a plenty of room f...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this area' or 'these areas'?
Suggestion: this area; these areas
...ilise the Earths climate. If we destroy these area, the cost of managing the resulting cha...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 43, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... conclision, we have no right to decide whether or not wild animals should exist, and I believ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1254.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7320754717 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51368911472 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554716981132 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.837668823 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4615384615 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07692307692 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250861657952 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943195426525 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0894536314115 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164739010512 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314094816184 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.