Young people are often influenced in their behaviours and situations by others in the same age. This is called "peer pressure". Do the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages.

Nowadays, youngesters are more likely to grow up in their friends' environment rather than they likely to grow in their parent environment. Thus, young people may influence by their same age friends. This interaction between friends may have advantage sides and disadvantages sides. In this essay I am going to discuss whether disadvantages of peer pressure more than advantages.

Firstly, Parents might show less attention on their children and, the children might be grown ignorant or having bad personality such as use of bad words, respectfulness, insulting etc. If youngester spend time with this kind of people. He may tend to be the same as this kind of people, which means they may influenced badly. Secondly, If young people surrounded with uneducated, careless, irrespectful people, he may not show good achievements on their fields. In addition to this, he may earn bad habits such as using drugs, smoking cigarettes etc. Thirdly, As a result of this behaviour, their career may be affected which may create worse generation.

As it has cons, there must be advantages as well.Right friendships encourge people to be succesful both in education and in the everyday life. They can influence each other to do project and some valueable work.

When we compare the pons and cons, It is obvious that cons are much more further than pons. Because of youngesters surrounded by many bad people who are not giving any benefit to them and number of this kind of people too much and recently increased. So, disadvantages will show the same increase simultaneously.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task II - IELTS Academic
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 50, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Right
... cons, there must be advantages as well.Right friendships encourge people to be succe...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 69, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'further' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: further
... cons, It is obvious that cons are much more further than pons. Because of youngesters surro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, well, in addition, kind of, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1315.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11673151751 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89016802361 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610894941634 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5642321329 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6666666667 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22814172432 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809555632068 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689161807118 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130651754109 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697609652557 0.056905535591 123% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.