Many people believe that charging for the foreign tourists must be higher than local people for visiting places which are historically and culturally important has become a matter of great concern for developing countries which effectively leads to the country's economy boosting. However, I partly agree with this statement that It is suitable and convenient for some situations where people can easily afford for visiting places. On top of that, When the people have not enough and sufficient money that they need to see the cultural and historical places to make their educational dreams true.
To begin, by charging foreign tourists much, a country can be economically benefited because increasing the charge for foreign tourists help to make respective country's economy strong so that through this government may start many long-term based projects to change the life of the native people. For instance, the government can invest some amount of money
by targeting illiterate people to educate them. As a result, people of the country will become more educated and will learn new ideas regarding to empower their self consciousness about happening around them.
However, increasing the charge by great amount for foreign tourists may not always be effective concerning the fact that the people who are impoverished and they can not afford much as well. These people won't get chance of getting knowledge of
cultural and historical places of other countries. Consequently, there will be chance of not getting well with each other which may probably affect especially for business as we are known to the fact that business are directly connected with the cultures and traditions of the country to some larger extent. Moreover, charging much for foreign tourists may demotivate foreigners to come and visit again the same place.
In conclusion, charging higher for foreign tourists shouldn't always make mandatory, but It is relevant charging high for people who are from affluent country. Also, If the people are from poor country and they are very interested in culture and history then they should not charge high.
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London 2000 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 65
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Development in technology have brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both view and give 61
- The chart below shows the annual number of rentals and sales (in various formats) of films from a particular store between 2002 and 2011. 67
- Consumption of fast food by Australian teenager 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vernment can invest some amount of money by targeting illiterate people to educat...
^^^^
Line 6, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... wont get chance of getting knowledge of cultural and historical places of other ...
^^^
Line 9, column 53, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...n, charging higher for foreign tourists shouldnt always make mandatory, but It is releva...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, then, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1790.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2802359882 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60167291908 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530973451327 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.9172642301 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.166666667 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.25 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27626190128 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112719877938 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602840689731 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144517043338 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750362598418 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.