With increase population and even growing urban centers many countries are losing their natural beauty spots What benefits are there to protect places of natural beauty How can this be solved

It is an apparent fact that overpopulation and raising city centers have been increased rapidly and at alarming rates. For this reason, a multitude of sightseeing are being dramatically destroyed which exerts an adverse impact on both human's life and the economy of country. In the following, this essay will talk about the advantages of having beautiful places and several ways to maintain it.
To begin with the benefit, The first thing that need to be said is stunning landscapes play a vital role in promoting tourism. In the domination of technology, a growing number of people consider traveling as a journey of fantastic pictures, as a result, they pay more attention to the natural beauty of their destination. It is indisputable that which countries are able to protect more real sight tend to attract more citizens. Furthermore, if tourism has a sustainable development, it will contribute to the fast-speed of country's economy. This can be explained by this example. In the digital age when information has been spread instantly, if a person is satisfied with services and landscapes of those areas, it is highly possible that he or she will suggest those to others which boosts more and more people come to visit. Consequently, residents of tourist-attraction places tend to stand a good chance to have a better life. Wealthy places which mean they contain a great amount of modern equips and cutting-edge inventions which not only enhance the income of tourism each year but also change the lives of people in a positive way.
As the benefits have been mentioned above, it is justified that natural sightseeing is one of the chief influence on people's life. Because of its importance, these solutions need to be taken into account to keep it longer. Firstly, the government will be the main factor to reduce overpopulation and growing urban areas. It is advisable that they make campaigns in order to develop publish awareness of pollution is triggered by overload people. Additionally, support family planning on social media and transportation where regularly full of nearly everybody. On the one hand, give incentives and praised for those who strictly followed the government's suggestion by migrating or taking family planning. Furthermore, citizen's voluntarily are not impossible to tackle this problem. Individuals are able to do small actions like collecting garbage along the streets, preventing others from discharging pollutants or propagandizing people to be responsible for their livings. Even doing simple thing also contribute to the big goal of human.
All things considered, it is recommended that the government and residents join hands to decrease the difficulty level of this trend. Only by doing that, can we tackle it. With a view to maintaining the natural beauty, these feasible measures should be implemented to address this problem as soon as possible.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
... which exerts an adverse impact on both humans life and the economy of country. In the...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...laces and several ways to maintain it. To begin with the benefit, The first thi...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1128, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ear but also change the lives of people in a positive way. As the benefits have been mentione...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he lives of people in a positive way. As the benefits have been mentioned abov...
^^
Line 3, column 580, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll of nearly everybody. On the one hand, give incentives and praised for those wh...
^^^
Line 4, column 65, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...sed for those who strictly followed the governments suggestion by migrating or taking famil...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o contribute to the big goal of human. All things considered, it is recommended...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, in fact, as a result, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2434.0 1615.20841683 151% => OK
No of words: 466.0 315.596192385 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22317596567 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01065237176 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 273.0 176.041082164 155% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585836909871 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 763.2 506.74238477 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7975105853 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.826086957 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2608695652 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21739130435 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226252963835 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055426702199 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472360589414 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108371369554 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035370270479 0.056905535591 62% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 78.4519038076 181% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
... which exerts an adverse impact on both humans life and the economy of country. In the...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...laces and several ways to maintain it. To begin with the benefit, The first thi...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1128, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ear but also change the lives of people in a positive way. As the benefits have been mentione...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he lives of people in a positive way. As the benefits have been mentioned abov...
^^
Line 3, column 580, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll of nearly everybody. On the one hand, give incentives and praised for those wh...
^^^
Line 4, column 65, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...sed for those who strictly followed the governments suggestion by migrating or taking famil...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o contribute to the big goal of human. All things considered, it is recommended...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, in fact, as a result, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2434.0 1615.20841683 151% => OK
No of words: 466.0 315.596192385 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22317596567 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01065237176 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 273.0 176.041082164 155% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585836909871 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 763.2 506.74238477 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7975105853 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.826086957 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2608695652 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21739130435 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226252963835 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055426702199 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472360589414 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108371369554 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035370270479 0.056905535591 62% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 78.4519038076 181% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.