In many countries, very few young people read newspapers or follow the news on TV. What do you think are the causes of this?What solutions can you suggest?
In the contemporary society, it is true that very few youngsters read newspaper or watch news on TV. This is because of the latest development of technology. In this essay, I shall analyse some relevant problems and provide a solution as well.
Reading newspaper or following news on TV is considered old fashioned in today's generation. Firstly, many young people especially teenagers are more involved in social networking websites and apps. Secondly, latest smartphones has diverted minds of innumerable individuals from traditional thinking to modernization. Moreover, youngsters spend more time in their smartphones or tablets to play games, watch YouTube or social media. For example, youngsters prefer to infuse their free time in their smartphones rather than doing something productive. The other major worry to this muddle is lack of parents involvement in their children's life.
Accordingly, a solution to the aforementioned issue should also be varied. Firstly, teenagers should be involved in productive activities like reading newspaper or watch TV. Secondly, smartphones and tables have made it convenient to get up to date information on the news around the world at the finger tip. Furthermore, youngsters should make a daily routine to read or watch news in their smartphones rather than investing more time in non-important things like social networking. This will not only help them to get updated information but also reading will ameliorate and improve vocabulary. Parents play a paramount role for child's future success. Therefore, parents should encourage their children to read newspaper or watch news as it is very vital in daily life.
To summarize, many young people refrain from reading newspaper or follow news on TV. I believe, students should spend more time in productive things like watching news or read newspaper with the help of the latest smartphones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-23 | krastogi | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | manas | 89 | view |
| 2019-06-06 | dhan0517 | 56 | view |
| 2019-04-28 | ayaa khairy | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-23 | Aya Hisham | 73 | view |
- You had arranged to meet a friend next week but you have realized that you will not be able to go Write a letter to your friend In your letter Cancel the meeting with your friend and opologize explain why you will not be able to meet your friend suggest w 87
- Some employers believe that job applicants' social skills are more important than their academic qualifications. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- Some employers believe that job applicants' social skills are more important than their academic qualifications. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- Some people think that young people are influenced more by their friends than by their parents or teachers. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people think that a person improves their intellectual skills more when doing group activities. To what extent do you agree? Use specific details and examples to explain your view. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43389830508 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99512962888 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528813559322 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3833980339 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.0555555556 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3888888889 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23072580546 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824421228345 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827517562189 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170795912852 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497131840297 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.