Nowadays, people's lifestyle has changed drastically due to the presence of technology. It is sometimes argued that technology-driven devices make life more stressful for humans. Despite this, I believe that modern facilities reduce the pressure of life from people's shoulders. This essay will show this by looking at how machines powered by artificial intelligence facilitate life for people and how developments in meteorology protect individuals' life against disasters like flood and earthquakes.
To begin with, it is the multi-functionality of advanced technological gadgets enabling humans to do variety of works simultaneously. For instance, it is possible to follow breakthrough international news while commuting to work. This applicability of futuristic appliances saves a lot of time and energy for people and make life easier for them. Thus, it can be truly claimed that these machines performed most of our daily duties, and as a result reduce the level of stress in our lives.
Secondly, the shrink in number of casualties and fatalities can be considered as an evidence to prove lower risky lifestyles. Let's consider a natural catastrophe such as flood. Today, the advances in weather forecasting enables the experts to anticipate the flood and warn people helping them to evacuate the endangered place in time. Therefore, improvements in technological devices play a crucial role in having a less risky life in modern times.
However, some assume that our ancestors had a longer life span because of consuming organic food. As the non-existence of genetically modified products, fewer people were afflicted with chronic disease like diabetes. Hence, changes in agricultural methods can be considered as a genuine catalyst to early death these days.
As mentioned aforesaid, the advance in technology leads to individualistic growth of life expectancy by making life less difficult and warning people about disastrous situations. I strongly agree that less perils threat people in modern times. In conclusion, I hope that we will able to live a stress-free life in the foreseeable future.
- People face for greater risks in our modern way of life when they did it in there past .How far do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people say that E- books and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magazines to what extent do you agree or disagree. 89
- People face for greater risks in our modern way of life when they did it in there past .How far do you agree or disagree? 89
- People face for greater risks in our modern way of life when they did it in there past .How far do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people believe that not all criminals should be kept in prison, but that some of them should be allowed to do unpaid work to help the community. Do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 365, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hines powered by artificial intelligence facilitate life for people and how devel...
^^
Line 1, column 501, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t disasters like flood and earthquakes. To begin with, it is the multi-functiona...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...idence to prove lower risky lifestyles. Lets consider a natural catastrophe such as ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...were afflicted with chronic disease like diabetes. Hence, changes in agricultural...
^^
Line 9, column 202, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun perils is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...trous situations. I strongly agree that less perils threat people in modern times. I...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1790.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50769230769 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23285500437 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627692307692 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6061240432 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4444444444 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0555555556 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211177847114 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607992186189 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451292711099 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111228491901 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499076963493 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.