Plastic shopping bags contribute to the pollution of land and sea. Some people think they should be banned. Do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Plastic shopping bags contribute to the pollution of land and sea. Some people think they should be banned. Do you agree or disagree?

Several things are polluting our land and sea, and one of these objectives is plastic shopping bags. Some people believe that plastic bags are affecting and polluting our lives, that's why they should be banned, others disagree with this point and think it must be kept.

On one hand, people think that these plastic bags should be banned and replace by alternatives. First, plastic bags are used in all houses for garbage, or in shops to hold in items. People are not acting wisely with these bags and throwing it randomly, some in the sea or land, this is polluting our ecosystem an effecting negatively our sea resources and land soil. Fish and vegetables will get polluted and people will suffer from several health problems. For example, in France plastic shopping bags are banned in most markets, people are obliged to buy ecofriendly bag to hold on their items. In my opinion, I agree with this point where governments should act and find best solutions for its people to live in an healthy environment.

On the other hand, some people think that banning plastic bags will impact negatively on many trading shops. First, the rate of buying will decrease, people will only buy their daily needs or what they can hold. Some think that government shall keep plastic bags and oblige its citizens to recycle and educate them for what purposes they need and how to use. Moreover, plastic factories will stop producing, number of unemployed will increase, countries will suffer from economic losses. For example, in Lebanon number of plastic companies is big and many families are living from this resource, that's why if plastic is banned families won't have money to live. From my side, I disagree since there is always alternatives and each country must oblige its people to start looking forward.

As a conclusion, plastic bags all over the world and is polluting our environment, some people think that they should be banned and others disagree. In my opinion, I think that we must accept this ban and start thinking what is the best for our ecosystem to stop polluting our oceans and lands.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-10 Sonu nbk 56 view
2019-11-10 Sonu nbk 56 view
2019-11-10 Sonu nbk 56 view
2019-07-07 sd90 73 view
2019-07-07 sd90 73 view
Essays by user enassar :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
... are affecting and polluting our lives, thats why they should be banned, others disag...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 670, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'find the best'.
Suggestion: find the best
... point where governments should act and find best solutions for its people to live in an ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 716, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...est solutions for its people to live in an healthy environment. On the other ...
^^
Line 6, column 597, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...families are living from this resource, thats why if plastic is banned families wont ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, moreover, so, for example, i think, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1751.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89106145251 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36827529648 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483240223464 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7483586732 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.4375 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411436146261 0.244688304435 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154111110578 0.084324248473 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104136023591 0.0667982634062 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.302423842663 0.151304729494 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104542983274 0.056905535591 184% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.