Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic.
Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?
Use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and with relevant evidence.
It is argued that developed countries should share their wealth with the underdeveloped countries in the forms of food and education. While others believe that it is the governments responsibility to provide for their citizens. I support the former point of view because this will help strengthen the roots of the country and government can focus on other important aspects. The essay will discuss further about them.
The help and support received from the first world countries will greatly aide in the development of third world countries. Firstly, the food received from the former will be of better quality which will provide for better nourishment of the children and young people. Therefore, people can work harder and earn for their country. Secondly, the education will enhance the knowledge of the children. They will be trained in the most appropriate way. For example, japan has a disciplined schooling system where students are taught to be self dependent and when children of underdeveloped countries learn these techniques they will grow up to be independent and confident.
However, government should also take measures to support their citizens and relying solely on the well developed nations will not be sufficient. Though it is imperative to gain education of better quality but it is equally important to apply the knowledge. Therefore, the government should ensure that there is sufficient job scope in the market for the learners. This will allow the individuals to grow further and eventually contribute to the economy of the country, which will in turn take the development of the country a step ahead.
To sum up, I would like to reiterate that although the wealthy nations should come forward to support the poorer Nations but the government should also hold a certain degree of responsibility and plan for further development of the country.
- You work for an international company and would like to spend six months working in its head office in another country Write a letter to your manager In your letter explain why you want to work in the company s head office for six months say how your work 78
- In many workplaces online communication is getting more common than meeting face to face Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The graph below shows US consumers average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- A friend you made while you were studying abroad has written to ask you for help in finding a job in your country You have heard about a job in a local company that might be suitable for him her Write a letter to this friend In your letter tell your frien 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...on. While others believe that it is the governments responsibility to provide for their cit...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, well, while, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22847682119 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82314432032 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513245033113 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2469159648 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.266666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153900647634 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565659907476 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525580928474 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104986671687 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249498478861 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.