There is no denying the fact that road transport more convenient in human beings lives in existing time. In the modern era, the burgeoning road transportation compares to rail services. I consider this trend constructive due to more benefits and I will explain certain perspective viewpoint in the upcoming paragraphs.
Commencing with the most salient reason lives than past since a majority of people have hectic life schedules nowadays due to they can not wait of the rail. Owing to, they are an excessive preference to road transportation. For example, it is not irrefutable that every one person purchases to own vehicles like as car, motorcycles. Moreover, if few individuals have not any vehicle, so they are using road transportation, who are conducted available by the authorities in every nation.
On other hand, it looks that road transport by few negative developments. Although the trend of road transportation has more worthwhile yet, we can not ignore the awful effects of this trend. The more transport vehicle, the more broadcast pollution in the environment day by day. In addition, the vehicle is more expensive despite miserable person are not buy to it and they come in dispersion condition. Ergo, it is clear that the burgeoning road transport by the more harmful impact on the phenomenon.
To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that tremendously positive aspects of the masses, it results look that it is a change of the human lifestyle by more advantage.
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in four countries in 1950 and 2002 and projections for 2050 100
- These days many people leave their country to work abroad and take their family with them Do you think benefits of this outweigh disadvantages in terms of family development 73
- The given line graph illustrates the proportion of the total music sold by three different ways between 2011 to 2010 overall it can be seen that the percentage of music sold through download and cds purchased decreased while by stream increased over the g
- The chart shows the sales of five different kinds of jam from 2009 to 2014 84
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, moreover, so, while, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1249.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 246.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07723577236 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05032210347 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593495934959 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7452880537 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0769230769 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9230769231 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23076923077 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17910158849 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653999364179 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498362248682 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0970289474048 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550999085187 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.