The necessity of uniformity in the working environment is a highly desirable topic. Advocates of a particular dress code, claim it should compulsory whilst others do not. This essay will discuss the positive and negative aspects of wearing a uniform during work.
This type of clothing can be beneficial in many ways. The first and foremost one is related to unity amongst workers. Many researchers, including Harward University, evidenced that people who have similar interests and choices, thoughts are probably the same. As a result, less dispute between employees of a particular organization. The unity and productivity will soar significantly. In addition, it is quite easy to identify the exact position, department, and company. Uniforms give a particular identity to workers. In factories, they allocate particular color for a specific department. For example, the office staff has a different color code than site employees.
On the other hand, negative aspects of this practice need to be discussed. Firstly, it is boring and reduces creativity. Instead of feeling motivated, it appears quite bleak and it affects them psychologically. Wearing the same clothes during the whole day feels devastating. This is one of the reasons behind reducing the level of creativity. Apart from this, it is uncomfortable to wear for a long time. In most cases, the uniforms are made of mixed types of fabric. It helps to increase its life span; however, it heats the body temperature. It is hard to work in uncomfortable attire.
In conclusion, this phenomenon has both positives and negatives. It is helpful to increase production and easy for identification, it is also boring and demotivating at the same time.
- The chart below gives information about the growth of urban population in certain parts of the world including the prediction of the future Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- Leaders and directors in an organization are normally older people Some people think younger leader would be better Do you agree or disagree 61
- Nowadays many big cities become overcrowded Why is it happening in your opinion What measures could be taken to prevent it 73
- Many people prefer to stay in the same type of work all their life whereas others prefer tochange the type of work Discuss both sides and state your own opinion 78
- Some companies and organizations require their employees to wear uniform What are the advantages and disadvantages of wearing uniform 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, so, apart from, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, in most cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30402930403 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10592040092 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 20.2975951904 54% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.3586507366 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 62.9565217391 106.682146367 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.8695652174 20.7667163134 57% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 6.34782608696 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121682339038 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0323711810277 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527342375502 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0722618694301 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570860711253 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.85 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.57 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.1190380762 63% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.