Some people believe that social networking sites have bring people together,but have adverse effect on communities and families. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Few people are of the belief that social networking sites are bringing people together, but have unfavorable effects on communities and families. At present, there are multiple social networking sites, like, Facebook, Linkedin, Instagram, Twitter. These social networking sites are not only bringing people closer around the globe but also provide cost-efficient means for communication. In my opinion, this statement can be agreed upon completely.
Social networking plays a major role in keeping the remote areas up to date with news and updates that are happening all around the world. The various platforms are providing an effective way for people to come together and interact with others. It also facilitates groups and pages, which supports various social causes. People are no longer bound by geographical boundaries in participating in events, tutorials, etc. Anyone in social media can join any group of their interest and learn or meet new people and make friends.
However, it has a negative side too. With the increase in social media, most youngsters are getting addicted to it. They are spending more time on them than extracurricular activities, studies, or with families. Also, not all views that are there on this media platform are positive. People are now more worried about the opinion of their followers than of themselves or their families. The negative remarks are often resulting in mental health problems. In addition to all this, people are often physically present in the family gatherings but mentally they are in their social media groups. This is causing more rifts in the families and friendships than making them closer.
In conclusion, I would like to say that social media is a great tool for bringing awareness, helping people, and more importantly in bringing people together. However, it has some serious drawbacks and should not be ignored, and therefore, people have to be very careful in the way they use this tool.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-23 | quynhhuong656 | 89 | view |
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 78
- Some people think children are more successful in foreign language studies than adults Discuss 67
- A museum near your home is looking for people to do part time voluntary unpaid work You would like to do some voluntary unpaid work at the museum Write a letter to the museum director to apply for the voluntary unpaid work In your letter 1 explain why you 84
- Overall the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today s world 70
- A friend has agreed to stay in your flat and look after it while you are away You want to give your friend some information about flat W A L to friend 1 Give information about flat 2 Provide any important instructions 3 what he should do if there is any p 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2253968254 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73228046016 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577777777778 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8903997141 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6315789474 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5789473684 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21052631579 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299585538182 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833922503045 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0978466179032 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191213623098 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0972861285809 0.056905535591 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.