Some people believe that using animals to test the safety of human medicines is cruel and unwarrented, whereas others feel it is a medical necessity. Discuss both views and state your own opinion.

To understand the pathological safety and potency of medicines, experiments are often conducted on animals by scientists. These practices remain a source of constant debate in our society. A section of society thinks that using animals to examine the safety of a drug is brutal and cannot be justified, whereas others disagree and emphasize that these procedures are necessary for medicinal improvements.

The primary reason why many people do not favor these experiments is rooted in the fact that a high proportion of animals lose their lives. While testing medicines, animals die or suffer many abnormalities due to the side-effects of the medicine. As they are also living beings, it is inhumane to risk their lives for experimenting the medicine safety. The Sunday Times has recently reported that more than 30 percent of the animals involved in experiments are dying annually all over the world.

On the contrary, some people feel that there is no other way around to check the effects of the medicine. Many animals have biological similarities with humans, especially rats, and these experiments can provide conclusive evidence for its therapeutic actions. If a new drug is administered directly to humans, it could be fatal for them. Although these examinations cannot be justified, yet there is no other alternative to check drug safety.

In conclusion, the testing of drugs on animals is barbaric, yet it is of the utmost importance for the survival of humans. Therefore, I believe that these medicinal trials are mandatory for the existence of human life.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 372, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...g the medicine safety. The Sunday Times has recently reported that more than 30 per...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, therefore, whereas, while, in conclusion, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1323.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22924901186 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94188531121 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588932806324 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4973858187 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.769230769 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169886245857 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603734599622 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048874917502 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106974095777 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270828681078 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.