It is controversial about whether women are supposed to shoulder equal responsibility as men in a nation’s police force or military force. From my perspective, women who are willing to do these jobs should have equal opportunities.
It is no denying that occupations like police or military usually require more strength and encouragement, and sometimes it can be dangerous. They are high-risk jobs, especially for women. In the process of combat with criminal or enemy, women may be failed because of a lack of sufficient energy. It seems professions like teacher and banker are more suitable for women.
Actually, some women are ambitious and they are willing to protect our country even though the work seems difficult. They attended professional training and they are competence to finish the work as men. For example, Liuyang is the first woman who travelled to the moon in China. She set a good example for the female who would like to accomplish difficult tasks. If women are allowed to do these kinds of work, they can exert their gender advantage and do it as well as men. Consequently, they can try their best to contribute to the safety of our country. Gender equality means women can get the same opportunities in every field as men, even if it looks impossible.
In conclusion, although there are some arguments that it is not suitable for women to work in police office or military, they should get equal chances to finish their career achievement and protect the people in our country.
- Some people believe that the women should play an equal role as men in country’s police and military fierce, such as army, while others, think women are not suitable for these king of work. Discuss and give your opinion. 56
- Nowadays some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works by using the computer Do you agree or disagree 89
- The charts below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the 78
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 78
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, first, if, look, may, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1257.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94881889764 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85010276063 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551181102362 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.456702272 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7857142857 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289400029416 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0995227448875 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635398434338 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191426514594 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386534222996 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.