Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills.Do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills.

Do you agree or disagree?

It has been argued for quite a long time whether the schools and universities should focus on theoretical aspects of education or hands-on skills. A vast majority of people believe that most of the high schools and universities mainly focus on theoretical lectures rather than practical skills. However, I strongly believe that they should focus on practical skills despite some drawbacks, such as the extra cost involved in conducting hands-on classes. In this essay, I will discuss my opinion further with relevant supporting reasons and examples.

To begin with, hands-on classes play an important role in educating children with broad mindset and knowledge. Nowadays, practical lectures are becoming increasingly popular among students. Nevertheless, young children learn more effectively by attending practical classes. Because it creates a real-time picture in their mind when they experimentally perform the task. Having more hands-on classes, schools and universities are also getting great results in terms of students passing percentage. Therefore, now most universities and schools are started focusing on these types of practical classes instead of theory lectures. In schools, for instance, students learn international languages by giving practical examples more effectively.

On the other hand, there are few drawbacks of practical classes. One of the major disadvantages of the practical classes is that it costs more to schools and universities to set up a laboratory for hands-on experience. In addition to that, they need some equipment and resources to run the laboratory. Many international technical universities, for example, have to buy expensive computers for students to perform some kind of research and practical assignments.

To sum up, the primary schools and universities should focus on hands-on lessons more than theoretical lectures. Providing facilities to practise assigned tasks could help students to understand the topic in a better way. In my opinion, they should provide some kinds of laboratories to students, which could be helpful for them while studying their academic subjects and learning new skills.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-07 sanjugohel 73 view
2019-11-28 amanda.mosby 11 view
2019-11-28 amanda.mosby 11 view
2019-11-09 Tejwani 11 view
2019-11-08 Tejwani 73 view
Essays by user rohit1234 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ctively by attending practical classes. Because it creates a real-time picture in their...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, kind of, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1835.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69875776398 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0165704296 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586956521739 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1327801521 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.944444444 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8888888889 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27777777778 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15971802008 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525654911755 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.034363848839 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101636280842 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00993055338389 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.48 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.