Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets, there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both the views and give our opinion.
Of late, people believe that enjoying movies on their mobile gadgets and tablets outweighs the fun over the silver screen while others believe that an exhilarating experience in movie theatre outmatched the entertainment quotient than any other means. In my opinion, based on the preference, the mode of viewing the motion pictures could opt after that.
On the one hand, people who have a liking towards the comfortable use of mobile phones to enjoy movies, have some justifications. Firstly, the movie tickets today are very expensive. The extensive growth in the entertainment industry has led to market monopoly which has resulted in increased prices. Secondly, the popcorn and snacks sold in the theatres presently are costlier than the costly tickets of the motion pictures. To illustrate, the price of food given in the theatres has risen due to the more and more demand of the people to munch out something during the running movie. Thus, for the real movie experience, an average family spend thousands of rupees that can upset the monthly budget.
On the other hand, the other people are inclined to go after the silver screen for an entertaining experience and they have explanations to advocate the same. Firstly, the sound system with Dolby Digital Technology which has taken a step up. The kind of experience people get from the surround sound atmosphere and 3D pictures in animation movies enliven the pictures shown. Secondly, people like to go to the cinema also to get the feeling of large screens. The size of the screen gives a vibrant and vivid definition of the magnificent movies running. These trigger an adrenaline rush which is difficult to get from mobile gadgets and tablets.
In conclusion, it would be justifiably right to say that considering circumstances, the decisions to choose between view modes could be suggested after that. People may have different preferences based on their perceptions as well as their convenience; however, viewing one in theatre provides a larger than life experience.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-27 | daly.shaker.99@gmail.com | 78 | view |
2019-09-29 | Agni | 56 | view |
2019-09-15 | Abhishek Biswas | 78 | view |
2019-09-15 | Abhishek Biswas | 78 | view |
2019-09-15 | Abhishek Biswas | 78 | view |
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets, there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both the views and give our opinion. 61
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets, there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both the views and give our opinion. 78
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets, there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both the views and give our opinion. 73
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets, there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both the views and give our opinion. 78
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets, there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both the views and give our opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 282, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... The kind of experience people get from the surround sound atmosphere and 3D pictures in ani...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, kind of, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15105740181 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76027137012 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561933534743 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 11.0 2.52805611222 435% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1964029957 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5625 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6875 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3125 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1414356908 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404224579833 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401786515969 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0834027964846 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244077194855 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.