Some people say that technologies such as mobile phones is disrupting social interaction. Do you agree or disagree?
It has been alleged by fair amount of people that advancement in technology and latest devices are having adverse impact on social communication. I do not agree with notion and opine that this development and gadgets are making people more social.
To begin way, people these days can easily stay in touch with their friend and relatives living at far places. Whole world has become a small place, where interaction with anybody is extremely easy. There are many advance applications in mobile phones which are helping the individuals to communicate with ease. For instance, earlier in yesteryears it takes huge time to send a message or have face to face interaction with our near ones, but know with updated features of mobile phone it can be done just on single touch. Apart from this, social networking sites on internet are motivating the people to join some common interest group and working in this area together, no matter where they are living but they are connected.
Digging deeper, any development can never harm the generation if it is utilized in balanced way, if people will start using this advancement in negative way then undoubtedly it will bring untoward repercussion, so blaming the advancement is not the ideal approach. For example, earlier planning the get together requires huge time but with features like watsapp group chat is making the planning a lot convenient and it can be done in much less time. So if youngsters are neglecting the face to face so they are at fault not the technology, because they are using it in adverse way. Furthermore, there are many working professional like army, navy and others employees, who are not having the spare time to meet their family member because of the work requirement, then can have virtual connection with family and never feel alone.
In conclusion, unequivocally few are living in the virtual world of their gadgets and ignoring interaction, but all because of their wrong approach, we cannot blame this technology for this. By using this modern application of mobile phone and internet in effective way, they can proof as an asset for human being and will connect the world in better way.
- Some people thinks that government should increase tax on unhealthy food to encourage people to start eating healthy Do you agree or disagree 76
- You share a parking area with several neighbors and have recently started having problems Write a letter to be copied to all neighbours that share the parking area In that letter 1 Explain the problems 2 Suggest ways to help the situation 3 Propose a meet 73
- The number of people getting higher who wearing fashionable clothes Is it good or bad situation 87
- Write a letter to your manager to request setting up a cafeteria for the staffs In your letter you should tell what you heard about the inconvenience from the staffs how you feel about it what suggestion you can give 85
- Teenagers face a lot of difficulties at home and at school What are the causes for this How can parents provide solutions 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le world has become a small place, where interaction with anybody is extremely ea...
^^
Line 3, column 619, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'professionals'?
Suggestion: professionals
...ay. Furthermore, there are many working professional like army, navy and others employees, w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, then, apart from, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1807.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95068493151 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63908864781 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553424657534 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.5423129811 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.0 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0769230769 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138126861547 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567722783853 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518127842365 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103628514998 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0761041505855 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.