In some schools and universities, girls tend to choose arts subjects (e.g. literature), and boys tend to choose science subjects (e.g. physics). Why do you think this is so? Should this tendency be changed?
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
According to the traditional belief, men are considered to be the bread winners whereas women are seen as care givers and are responsible for taking care of the family. Hence, girls opt for art subjects in schools and colleges and boys opt for science subjects. In my opinion, I unquestionably believe that this trend should be changed and both the genders should be given to choose subjects according to their interests.
The view that males have the sole responsibility to provide financial support to the family and females as taking care of the family members is deeply rooted in our society. The primary reason is the gender related personalities and competence. Simply stated, boys are considered to have analytical abilities which is not possessed in girls so that is why they opt for subjects like physics, chemistry and maths. Parents have an age old believe that the girls have to become housewives and look after their family is also the main objective of not persuading them to build a career as medical doctors or scientist. To illustrate, a research report has depicted that more that 30% of the girls do not take analytical related subjects as it is not appreciated by the family and society
Undoubtedly this trend should be changed and both the sexes should be treated with equality. Both men and women should be given the equal opportunity to choose the course on the basis of his interest and curiosity. Parents should not consider the main responsibility of girls to take care of the household chores but should encourage them to get high education and build a successful career. To elucidate, great ecientist like Marie Curie, Ada Lovelace have proved that women are no less than men in fields like science and physics.
In conclusion, I vehemently agree that both men and women should be treated impartially by the community and should be motivated to excel in fields like science and physics
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-26 | quynhhuong656 | 90 | view |
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online.Is this a positive or negative development?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.Write at least 250 wo 73
- “Your first impressions when you meet someone are always right.”Do you agree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.Write at least 250 words. 61
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information such as hobbies and interest and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree. Discuss both these views and 73
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction.Do you agree or disagree?Provide relevant examples if necessary. 56
- Schools should do more to teach students about their health and wellbeing Do you agree or disagree 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...excel in fields like science and physics
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, look, so, whereas, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93827160494 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70278748781 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503086419753 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.9504953051 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.333333333 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25279379587 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930990252914 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744521485238 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155578282746 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535925078865 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.