In contemporary times, technological improvement makes it possible to reach the farthest corner of the world, therefore people feel interested to visit those places which are environmentally tough and full of adventures. A field trip to these types of places such as the Sahara or Amazon forest has both advantages and drawbacks. In the following paragraphs, both perspectives will be discussed.
To begin with, positive views, to meet with the environmental roughness is not an easy task, for this reason, a man or woman has to be not only mentally but also physically strong. It will help them to learn to survive in the toughest situation. For example, nowadays people go to the Amazon or African forest to see the biodiversity and enjoy the natural beauty. When the trip is too long then they have to collect their own food and water from the bush and river. As a result, they have to face challenges to gather their daily necessaries and also keep them safe from dangerous predators such as tigers, lions, and so on. In addition, in terms of business and local economic development, in recent times, new hotels and resorts are built in the forest and desert, as a consequence, local people can earn and develop themselves both economically and socially. For instance, in the Sahara desert, many new hotels and restaurants are made for the tourists, therefore the local people, especially the nomad has changed their life.
However, despite having benefits it has some limitations too. To take the taste of adventure people sometimes fall into life-threatening movement likewise, in the forest every year many people died for the bite of poisonous snakes or attack of nocturnal animals. Because of the impassable area, people do not get help fastly from the rescue team. Moreover, many people do not survive due to the loss in the forest every year.
In conclusion, to sum up all the points above, these types of journey has both advantages and disadvantages but before starting people should prepare themselves to meet with the extreme situation.
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 78
- In many countries a small number of people can earn extremely high salaries some people believe that this is good for the country but others think that government should not allow salaries above a certain level Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- The number of people who are at risk of serious health problems due to being overweight is increasing What is the reason for the growth in overweight people in society How can this problem be solved 89
- The graph below shows the amount of UK investments in clean energy from 2008 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The table below describes percentages of homeschooled students in Some Country in 1999 2004 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 509, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'gathering'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: gathering
... a result, they have to face challenges to gather their daily necessaries and also keep t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, likewise, moreover, so, then, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1721.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03216374269 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81442279781 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573099415205 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.76152304609 294% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1740934306 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.733333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5333333333 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106988176063 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.032877609171 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409885841391 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0620758989769 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488613275094 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.