Nowadays, most of the people love visiting to the places where the conditions are really tough and challenging such as Sahara desert and the Antarctic. Apparently tourists can enjoy the immense joy and thrilling experience when they are undertaking difficult journeys. Whereas, these journeys may push those travelers into deep trouble and sometimes it would be more dangerous than expected. This essay will discuss both advantages and disadvantages of such adventurous trips.
One of the biggest benefits of travelling to unfriendly locations would be the thrilling experience that is enjoyed by most of the tourists as well as touching the untouched areas and testing their limits and abilities may be giving the travellers more satisfaction and excitement than just visiting to the usual locations. The feeling of accomplishment or achievement is not easy to explained by mere words. These days, most of the tourists love safaris and some are really keen on wildlife safaris which seems to be really dangerous. But still tourists are ready to accept the risk and lots of people have been visiting to those safari parks. Especially African lion safari parks are really famous among adventure lovers.
Another main benefit is developing survival skills against tough conditions which are always challenging for humans. In other words, the passion on adventure journeys always drives the people towards the toughest locations and they have to experience lots of challenging situations which made them to learn new skills to survive under different circumstances. For an example, when people from tropical countries visits to Antarctic they would learn the skills which is required to survive in the arctic countries and vice versa.
Even though adventurous trips are thrilling, on the flip side, there are some downsides and the most important drawback is that these trips can be always risky and highly dangerous. Things can go against their plans and travellers may be in trouble if something went wrong. However, travellers are aware of those risks.yet they want to get some sort of thrilling experiences. Lots of traveller have died while trekking the big mountains and rafting in turbulent rivers and some have hurt themselves and injured during the adventurous expeditions
To conclude, while people enjoy lots of benefits from difficult trips, there is a negative side also waiting for them. Most of the adventurous trips are extremely dangerous and many incidents have been recorded all over the world regarding accidents and loss of lives due to adverse weather conditions.
- Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic?What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places? 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
- Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic?What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places? 11
- Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic?What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places? 11
- Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic?What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 377, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun traveller seems to be countable; consider using: 'Lots of travellers'.
Suggestion: Lots of travellers
...get some sort of thrilling experiences. Lots of traveller have died while trekking the big mounta...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, however, if, may, really, regarding, so, still, well, whereas, while, as to, sort of, such as, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2192.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 409.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35941320293 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73383091234 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542787286064 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 662.4 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.0632546339 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.941176471 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0588235294 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.47058823529 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19429348077 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586040185805 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741500941198 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107375741426 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101748491052 0.056905535591 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.