Some people think that we should always start our feedback to others with criticism, whether it's to our coworkers at work or our students in school. Since individuals think that assignments might be made easier by negative comments. Even yet, I think I will give positive comments in such circumstances. I'll offer three justifications for my comprehension.
First and foremost, positive feedback can improve work efficiency. People will be happier and more willing to do the job if they receive positive feedback from others. Consider my friend Johnson. He and I both work for a company known for designing public buildings. We ran into issues when trying to come up with a difficult proposal for the city airport's new terminal. When I received his design, I gave him positive and encouraging feedback first, followed by negative responses. When he received my message, he was confident, and we finished the design faster than before. In contrast, if I only gave him negative feedback, he would be frustrated and upset about his work.
Second, positive feedback can easily lead to changes in work or assignments. If friends prioritize objective and positive messages during the collaboration, they will work in a more positive environment. People have an instinctive desire to receive positive messages from one another, and a relatively mild attitude toward feedback can bring such information. When colleagues receive positive feedback, it lowers the mental barrier and makes them less hesitant to revise their work. If we simply put negative or critical words in the title of our feedback, the receiver will be dissatisfied with our advice.
Finally, some people may believe that criticism is beneficial because it motivates our colleagues to solve problems quickly. However, if we only focus on the negative aspects of the question, we will quickly lose patience and become embroiled in a slew of meaningless conflicts and arguments. As a result, we must first make a favorable impression on the receiver before expanding on our discussions or debates.
In conclusion, there is a lot of thought about how to give advice to our friends or coworkers, and the discussion about that always devolves into endless talking. In my opinion, we should first provide friendly and peaceful information in order to gain the trust and comprehension of our classmates or colleagues, after which we can improve our collaboration and get to know each other better.
- Some people suggest that using a cleaner energy to protect the environment is better but some people say the traditional energy sources such as coal and oil is less expensive what is your suggestion 77
- Which do you prefer with the same rate of pay an interesting and challenging job with less vacation or a job with more vacation time but less fun 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends 73
- recording wedding or graduation events 73
- 1 If you are required to give feedback about your classmates colleagues work or performance would you like to give positive comments or negative comments first 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 150, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...kers at work or our students in school. Since individuals think that assignments migh...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 305, Rule ID: ILL_I_LL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I'll'?
Suggestion: I'll
...ositive comments in such circumstances. Ill offer three justifications for my compr...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2067.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 397.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20654911839 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94065043089 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564231738035 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 646.2 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.51792114695 284% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9578122317 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9545454545 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0454545455 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95454545455 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208968893122 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661324683441 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586875972085 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109917690565 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392016938718 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.