2. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, communities are facing a lot of problems. Most governments do not have enough power to help everyone in an organization. So satisfying to the community by its members is essential. Some people believe that young people give enough time to help their communities. Others think otherwise. I agree with the latter belief because of two reasons.
First, young people do not have enough time to help. Young people have a lot of works to do. They have to study a lot at university, work part-time or permanently for paying their university's fees and hang out with their friends. For example, when I was looking at a university, I spent most of my time doing my thesis. Since my project was about manufacturing a new system, I spent much of my time in a laboratory. I usually went to the lab at six o'clock in the morning, and I returned at 8 p.m. I also use my weekend to write my project results. So, young people do not have time to help.
Second, young people do not have money to help. Most of the community's needs usually have a relation to money. Since young people virtually do not have a permanent job, they can help their communities. For example, When I was in high school, many people came to me for money. They usually needed this money to buy a meal. However, at that time, I received a little pocket money from my parents. Although I usually help them, I usually did not have money, and this always suffered me. In sum, young people typically do not have money to help.
Young people nowadays do not help their communities because they do not have time and money. However, they can increase their role in helping their communities by better using their time and saving their money.
- 2 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In order to be well informed a person must get information from many different news resources Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- TPO 13 Integrated Writing Task Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils the petrified remains of ancient organisms ever since the eighteenth century In recent years however the sale of fossils particularly of dinosaurs and other lar 100
- TPO 39 Independent task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- TPO 20 Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 449, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: o'clock
...atory. I usually went to the lab at six oclock in the morning, and I returned at 8 p.m...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, look, second, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1396.0 1977.66487455 71% => OK
No of words: 306.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56209150327 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56544898058 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 212.727598566 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467320261438 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 444.6 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.672388462 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 60.6956521739 100.406767564 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.3043478261 20.6045352989 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.21739130435 5.45110844103 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341611437984 0.236089414692 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132895512751 0.076458572812 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118549814182 0.0737576698707 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259991840124 0.150856017488 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669189027507 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.7 11.7677419355 57% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.28 10.9000537634 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 86.8835125448 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.002688172 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.