3) Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught.
The relationship between students and educators is a pivotal factor in learning and extremely important regardless of age or education level. Almost everybody can remember of a special teacher from the past even if they are from childhood. This is because teachers play an important hole in student’s lives. I agree with the statement that get along with the students is more important deep knowledge. I fell this way for the following reasons.
Firstly, having excellent skills and knowledge is a requirement of all professions but does not make a remarkable professional. Similarly occurs with educators, being the leading authority in a subject does not make an ineffable teacher. The ability to relate and communicate well, however, will indicate the best teachers and other workers. My own experience demonstrates this concept, when I was a student I thought that many of my professors has great degree and knowledge but did not know how to transfer all that subject efficiently. This is because they did not relate well with the class and it impairs our learning.
Secondly, the main function of educators, go beyond teaching, is to identify the student’s challenges and provide resources for them to overcome it. Teachers should recognize the difficulties and fears of each student and change the methodology of study if necessary. Such qualities, not just in an academic view, inspire students in life with values such as respect and commitment. For instance, after identifying the problem and talking with student the teacher should refer them to a specialized professional such as psychologist or tutors, accordingly to the individual necessity.
Finally, the environment of confidence and respect enhance the process of learning. Although all interactions have problems to deal with, it is important to pursue a respectful relation into the classroom. This will enhance and improve the process of teaching and learning since it is an exchange of wisdom and knowledge. When the professor uses their experience, advice, information and knowledge along with their ability to get along with students they achieve a special relation that concomitant motivates and inspire the class.
To sum up, I strongly believe that the teacher’s ability to get along with students is more important than deep knowledge. This is because having deep knowledge is a requirement of all professions, the main function of educators is helping students to overcome their challenges and the confidence environment stimulates and enhances the process of learning.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A teachers ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 76
- It has recently been announced that a new restaurant may be built in your neighborhood.Do you support or oppose this plan? 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement There is nothing that an uneducated person can teach an educated person Use specific reason and examples 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...oes not make a remarkable professional. Similarly occurs with educators, being the leadin...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, well, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2175.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 402.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41044776119 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0669341769 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502487562189 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 668.7 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3233639144 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.75 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377939857322 0.236089414692 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109139309256 0.076458572812 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0896963914831 0.0737576698707 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206454729629 0.150856017488 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466438762582 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.