The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide.
Although some people find traveling alone is the best way to see the world, I feel otherwise since group traveling is easier and safer than single journeys.
To begin with, leading by a tour guide has an important advantage, which makes me prefer guided tours rather than solo tours. This is the simplicity. Planning of the journey calls for a huge amount of time to select places what to visit. It demands to look for reviews of touristic attractions in order to decide whether the place has to be visited or not. By the same token, people often do not pay a lot of attention to either history or origin of touristic attractions, so those may be missed in single tours. In contrast, all of these problems disappear, when we decide to travel with a guide. We do not have to think about any detail of our adventure, we should choose a city or country that we want to see. The other will be done by a company that we ask for organizing the tour, so we should follow a guide only. As a result, we can focus on the rest rather than problems of organization.
What is more, traveling alone can be dangerous especially in developed countries. Tourists may become victims of fraud or theft in third world countries. Fortunately, a guide can diminish risks finding ourselves in an unpleasant situation. Of course, touristic groups attract thieves as well, still they commit serious crimes less frequently when they deal with groups of people. When people are traveling in a group, the most common type of crime is stealing wallets that do not pose so many risks as crimes that can be committed with single travelers. For instance, I have heard even about murders of single travelers. Furthermore, the proper guide is aware of laws, customs of the visiting country, so she/he has to be able to help avoid inappropriate behavior that may be a cause of troubles. However, if a trouble is obtained, a guide can help to manage it, for he likely knows both the language and laws of the country.
To summarize, both simplicity and safeness make me prefer traveling in a group than alone.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-11 | Pham Ngoc Anh | 76 | view |
| 2023-06-30 | AJ720 | 88 | view |
| 2023-06-08 | Vivian Chang | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-08 | Vivian Chang | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-02 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
- Universities 84
- Moai 3
- Some movies are serious, designed to make the audience think. Other movies are designed primarily to amuse and entertain. Which type of movie do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Some movies are serious, designed to make the audience think. Other movies are designed primarily to amuse and entertain. Which type of movie do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- What famous place would you like to visit? Use details and reasons to support your response. 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, still, third, well, as to, for instance, i feel, in contrast, of course, as a result, to begin with, what is more, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1714.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 368.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65760869565 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60029785083 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573369565217 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1104693 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2105263158 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3684210526 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.10526315789 5.45110844103 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176637178849 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047176877252 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687076093322 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136198616073 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760785814133 0.0645574589148 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.