Celebrities (such as actors, musicians and athletes, etc.) sometimes express their political views in public. Some people appreciate knowing the political views of celebrities, others think it is not appropriate or useful to know the political views of celebrities. Which opinion do you agree with?
In today's modern and sophisticated world, politics plays an essential role in people's lives. In this connection, famous people can guide others toward each political side. Although contested by many that the matter of grasping actors' political views is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I believe that understanding the celebrities' notions in political fields is detrimental, and I will analyze my reasons throughout this essay.
Firstly, celebrities are not well-educated in fields which are related to the governments, so they are not a suitable person. To be more specific, maybe they are a knowledgable person in art or music; however, they are not competent to express their views about politics because they have the same level information as publicity have. For example, in a previous election, one athlete claimed that one of the candidates was the best. Because he was a role model, most of society imitate him without any research. After a candidate became the president, he made countless fatal decisions, so people comprehended their mistakes. Therefore, they understand that they should not rely on who was not professional in politics.
Secondly, people and celebrities have a different point of view in political subjects, so people will deviate from knowing their notion. To elucidate, actors affect individuals' ideas by expressing their side in different issues, so they do not allow one to think independently. Hence, people are influenced and change their notion based on celebrities. According to my own experience, a government increased taxes to spend this extra revenue on public transportations' renovation, which at first make people satisfied, but musicians protested to that decision. Hence, they altered individuals' thoughts, and people did not pay their taxes. After one year, by wrecking most of the seats in public buses, people understood they should pay their taxes and regretted. Moreover, they found that celebrities disagreed with improving public transportation because they did not use them.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on each side, I profoundly believe that realizing celebrities' opinions in political fields is harmful. Their ideas not only are not according to political information but also have a conflict with other people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-05 | cocoza@gmail.com | 85 | view |
| 2022-09-05 | cocoza@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-05 | cocoza@gmail.com | 85 | view |
| 2022-09-05 | cocoza@gmail.com | 85 | view |
| 2022-09-05 | cocoza@gmail.com | 88 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Although science and technology will continue to improve the most significant improvements for the quality of people s lives have already taken place 80
- High school students should be required to study many different subjects at the same time or they should study only three or four subjects at a time Which one do you prefer 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is difficult for teachers to be both popular liked by students and effective in helping students in learning 90
- Grades encourage students to work harder at school Do you agree or disagree Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 76
- If you are required to give feedback about your classmates colleagues work or performance would you like to give positive comments or negative comments first 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 453, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'transportations'' or 'transportation's'?
Suggestion: transportations'; transportation's
...s to spend this extra revenue on public transportations renovation, which at first make people ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...also have a conflict with other people.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2014.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 367.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48773841962 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04141147441 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577656675749 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 631.8 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3092519132 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3157894737 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26315789474 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332300231482 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933358726527 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735420357009 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20391356253 0.150856017488 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573269655485 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.