Voting is an important act of patriotism in a democracy. Not every country allows its citizens to participate in the election process; therefore, we should appreciate the fact that the United States allow us to. It is an act that must be taken seriously; thus, adolescents just above 15 should not be able to vote. I support this opinion for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
Young adults do not fully understand how life works, and have not had many life experiences. That is to say ,they haven't finished high school, thus, it is unlikely that they have had traveled abroad or debated with people with different point of views about politics. These are experiences that an older person would have that would enable them to understand the importance of the voting process. For instance, when I was 15 years old all I did was joking around and not taking anything seriously. If I had been able to vote, I would probably have voted for an underdog candidate just for kicks and giggles. Not fully understanding the process, I would probably have tried to convince my friends to do the same thing. I don't think I had sufficient maturity to vote. However, at a later stage of my life, I felt that I was able to better understand the process and select the most qualified candidate.
Secondly, young adults should enjoy their lives first and not worry about politics at that stage in their lives. If adolescents fully engaged in the process of creating a political position, some of them would not want to talk to their friends anymore because of their different beliefs. Adults already have that problem when they find out that someone that they care about is voting for somebody that they fundamentally disagree with. For example, last year in my country we had presidential elections, and it was the most polarizing process I have ever seen. Some of my family members stopped talking to each other because of their different political views and support of opposing candidates. My 15-year-old cousin did not understand why our mothers were feuding. Therefore, young adolescents should not have to face that unpleasant experience at that phase of their lives.
In conclusion, young adults just above the age of fifteen should not be able to vote. The voting process is an important act of a democracy and young children do not have enough experience to understand the voting process. They should enjoy their youth and not worry about fighting over politics.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ad many life experiences. That is to say ,they havent finished high school, thus, ...
^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
... life experiences. That is to say ,they havent finished high school, thus, it is unlik...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 450, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'joke'
Suggestion: joke
..., when I was 15 years old all I did was joking around and not taking anything seriousl...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 721, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ince my friends to do the same thing. I dont think I had sufficient maturity to vote...
^^^^
Line 3, column 902, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd select the most qualified candidate. Secondly, young adults should enjoy thei...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2065.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 424.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87028301887 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61065091031 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48820754717 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 641.7 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0090228669 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8636363636 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2727272727 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22727272727 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226714969406 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676773776289 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802519619448 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177523562395 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117882525662 0.0645574589148 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.