Government always plays a very important role in how to make financial decisions that is beneficial to the society and the future of a country. In modern society, internet has been becoming an indispensable part of human's life. While infrastructures, like the public transportations, are even more basic and more important for people’s lives and deserve more financial support. So I disagree with the statement above, but agree that government should spend more money on improving public transportation to meet everybody’s the very basic requirement.
First, a good public transportation system would definitely improve people's life standards. Especially, to a rural area or many undeveloped, remote territories, the transportations are essential to their development. Only with the improvement of transportation, they could have access to the outside and connect with the unknown and wider world. Consequently, more businesses could happen, more opportunities to improve the local people’s income. Undoubtedly, with the convenient transportations, people’s life standard could reach a new level. Take the Chinese rural area or even my own village, few years ago, we finally had a better road connecting with town because of government’s financial support. With more people own cars, it is so efficient to go to towns and cities. So life became much easier. On the other hand, internet access became more accessible as well.
Second, public transportations are like a concrete internet, connecting people from all different areas and bring various possibilities no matter it is economic, cultural or educational field. Moreover, good public transportations would tremendously improve efficiency in trade and traveling and ordinary life. For example, the city where my college located still depends on the old style trains as main public, long distance transportation. By contrast, many cities, especially first-tier cities, have developed all kinds of transportations, metro, highway train, airplane, bustling bus system and abundant taxi services. All these in return brings back countless economic benefits and incredibly improves efficiency.
Admittedly, Internet access is also a crucial resource for humans. It brings us unimaginative possibilities to do a wide variety of things, from get information to have online courses, from entertainments to work. That’s why government haven been paying so much attention to and invested a huge amount of money on internet. So, it’s time for government to consider doing more for public transportation.
To conclude, good public transportations not only can improve people’s living standards, but also improve a nation’s economy, help different areas develop in a more balanced way. I confidently believe it is a great thing for government to do to put more money on improving public transportations.
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars than there are today 60
- arts and athletics 73
- TPO 36 Independent For the successful development of a country it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children five to ten years old than to spend money on universities 70
- Do you agree or disagree that teachers should not make their social or polical views known to students in school 70
- sports and social activies classes and libraries 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, if, moreover, second, so, still, well, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2449.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 430.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69534883721 4.8611393121 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38580132642 2.67179642975 127% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586046511628 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 761.4 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.6222888673 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.041666667 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9166666667 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.448742262595 0.236089414692 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119698878214 0.076458572812 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0970320035444 0.0737576698707 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262388635133 0.150856017488 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807313598598 0.0645574589148 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 58.1214874552 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.48 10.9000537634 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 86.8835125448 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.