Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Knowing about our ancestors and our country's previous social and political conditions are the main topics of history courses. Number of universities demands their students to pass a compulsory history class. However, a few other institutions regard this history course selective for their students. Personally, I believe that history course should be taken by all students during university period for two main reasons.
First, history course would provide students with so much additional fresh information. Normally, most of the undergraduate students attend similar courses relevant to their specialty. Selective courses like history which deals with many issues from a different perspective can give beneficial information to students about the stories behind any achievement we readily read about in our other classes. For example, I studied chemistry at university for my bachelor degree which I was very enthusiastic about. In contrary, I hate to be present in my history classes during my study, since I found its lessons and topics boring and useless. But, one day, when I reluctantly was listening to the professor, he started to talk about an incident that leads to a chemical invention which I never heard of it in any textbook. It was the point where I understood that any course might give us some unexpected reliable information.
Second, history can assist us to understand and shape our social and political personality. Genarally, all of the students put their endeavors strongly during their academic period to increase their opportunities in finding a promising career in the future after their graduation. Nowadays, many private companies encourage their employees to have majors with interdisciplinary attributes to fully understand the market numerous political and social varying aspects. Therefore, history can train and prepare us in these areas and expands our horizon to deal better with issues of our future company.
In conclusion, history classes can help the students in many dimensions. some universities prefer to make it obligatory for their students which is good for many reasons. It can teach much new constructive information. Also, it satisfies our future jobs need to recruit people with awareness of past social and political stage of country. So, studying history would be better than not experiencing it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-02 | wendy928025866 | 76 | view |
- summarize the points made in the lecture about building of a new weapon named burning mirror by Greek nation, being sure to explain how it casts doubt on specific points made in the passage about possibility of building such weapon. 90
- How do movies or TV influence people s behavior Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer 95
- It has recently been announced that a new movie theater may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? 76
- Businesses should hire employees for their entire lives. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 75
- It s better to make wrong decision than make no decision at all Do you agree or disagree with the statement Give reasons or specific examples to illustrate your answer 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 104, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...l and political personality. Genarally, all of the students put their endeavors strongly d...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 74, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...n help the students in many dimensions. some universities prefer to make it obligato...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1999.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 365.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47671232877 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92992403819 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567123287671 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9625977394 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.95 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200479539149 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682034849956 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490357449698 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136182002952 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329573140536 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 10.9000537634 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.