Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
History gives us insight truth of any events and helps us to broaden our knowledge. People are having a hard time reaching a consensus on whether all university students should take history courses or not. Some people hold conflicting views. As far I am concerned, I firmly believe that there is no need to take this course for every student. There are several reasons that support my point of view and I would explore a few of the most important ones here.
To begin with, there may have enough freedom for choosing their subject choice. Student should take whatever they like and it is obvious that any oppressive rules never brings good things. It is true that it sometimes makes burden for students. My own experience is compelling evidence for what I mean. I am a CSE student and i have to learn so much programming code. It is without a shadow of a doubt that managing time is the biggest challenge for me. Base on this point, it is quite difficult like others CSE students. Morever, many students do not prefer to study history. So oveall, the study of history is not related to other subjects like CSE.
Secondly, the point that comes to mind that history sometimes drive human in wrong way by giving false information or makes violence. As man make wrong history and try to spreed among people. For example, last decades in our country, the goverment presented that time made and outreach that Jia rahman was the founder of bangladesh but the actual scene is Seikh rahman is the founder of our nation. Consequently, we learned false knowledge. So, the knowledge which is not constant and always changes according the authority will be best choice for students.
Finally given the factors I outlined above, we may reach a conclusion that it would be impractical idea imposing on this rules,
- TPO 36 integrated writing 40
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Some parent offer their school age children money for each high grade mark they get in school Do you think this is a good idea Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- Tpo 30 integrated writing A little over 2 200 years ago the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse According to some ancient historians the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a burning mirror a polished copper surface 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 600, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o study history. So oveall, the study of history is not related to other subjects...
^^
Line 3, column 529, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'be the best'.
Suggestion: be the best
...ys changes according the authority will be best choice for students. Finally given t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 558, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ority will be best choice for students. Finally given the factors I outlined abo...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...ty will be best choice for students. Finally given the factors I outlined above, we ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 117, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...t would be impractical idea imposing on this rules,
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, i mean, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 52.1666666667 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 314.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74522292994 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4967096689 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614649681529 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3919725325 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.5 100.406767564 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171072948454 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0457139949538 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518122311047 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0897742344465 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668192174277 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 11.7677419355 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.