Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Throughout history, thinkers and intellectuals have accentuated on studying history and fate of different nations. A controversial question which is often raised regarding this issue is whether all university students should be required to take history courses or just students whose major is about history must know about it. Some people possess the conviction that all students have should be aware of historic events whereas others hold exactly the opposite and allege that it is not necessary. I personally contend that to be well-informed in realm of history could be absolutely fruitful and its merits overweigh demerits. The following paragraphs represent a cursory glance at the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is concerned with this issue that history of prior nations and countries is a mirror for future of recent countries. In fact, we can aptly choose our future by meticulously pondering the past societies. Had we not learned about the mysteries of triumph and defeat of them, we would be next defeated nation of this terrestrial world. The noteworthy statistics, revealed by a recent social research conducted in our country, show that in most of the advanced and developed countries, the study of history in schools for all students is crucial. On the other hand, in more than 70 percent of developing or poor countries this is not the case.
The second rationale behind this opinion is rooted in the fact that by thinking of the previous formidable events and built structures, we can get some ideas for the future of our country. To shed light on this issue, suppose the famous pyramids of Egypt. These overwhelming structures could be inspiring for architectures and civil engineers. Another example is a great wall in China. These structures are, in fact, the sign of ancestors' endeavors. We can learn lots of things from them by paying attention to them. In my opinion, these structures would be symbols of struggling in life and not yielding and surrendering against obstacles and problems.
In conclusion, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that history plays a pivotal role in our lives and today can depict the future of us. Consequently, it is recommended that schools consider this lesson as one of the most important lessons.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.Use specific reasons and examples to support you 86
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind elucidating'.
Suggestion: mind elucidating
... reasons. The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is concerned with this is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, regarding, second, so, well, whereas, as for, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1969.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18157894737 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90237628309 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.507836533 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.631578947 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68421052632 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161022770596 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0415675341972 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509600918811 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.089625066146 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776280670486 0.0645574589148 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.