Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
No one can deny that there are both negative and positive aspects of learning about historical events. If I were forced to choose, I would definitely state that it would not be necessary for all students to take a history courses in university for two critical reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, I think these classes would be so dull and flat for the student with unrelated field of study. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. For instance, when I was 18, I had some history courses in the university but I did not want to attend those classes. In that time my major was psychology and it was not interesting for me to attend to those classes. Therefore, most of the time I felt sleepy and I could not concentrate on the teacher's lecture. As a result, I could not pass those classes and I had to take them over and over. I think this example could show you how much is important for students to take courses that they like and it would be even better for them to take courses that are related to their main field.
Finally, I think forcing students to take history courses without considering their major field of study would be real waste of their time. They probably can use that amount of time doing something valuable and beneficial. For instance, one of my problem with taking history courses in university was that I did not want to spend my time on something that is not going to be profitable for me at the end. Once, I had to attend to one of my history class even though I had some exam the other day. It was hard for me because I wanted to study more but that would not be plausible because I had to be present on that class. You can imagine how mad I was at that time. I was feeling miserable and did not know what to do. As a result, I attended to that class and did not study for the exam. I got low grade from that exam only because of some redundant class. For the examples like this I think it is not necessary for the students with unrelated field of study to take history course or courses.
In the light of above mentioned reasons, I think there is no need for students with different field of study to take some history courses and I believe that these classes would be so boring for them and that would be waste of time for those students.
- TPO-3 Integrated writing 3
- tpo4 3
- TPO-18 - Integrated Writing Task 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TOEFL T P O 18 - Integrated Writing Task 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, therefore, for instance, i think, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 76.0 43.0788530466 176% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1945.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 450.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.32222222222 4.8611393121 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.368164367 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.408888888889 0.524837075471 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 630.9 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4245119409 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.25 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.85842293907 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238803825181 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814913553186 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709194759066 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167770412182 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320898282147 0.0645574589148 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.07 10.9000537634 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.87 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.