The household chore is an important part of our daily lives and an opportunity for younger family members to practice certain life skills. It has never failed to arouse public concerns and at the same time provoke a hot debate about whether children should learn to do household chores. It's hard to deny that spending more time in the study will improve their academic performances. Such a fact leads impressionable people to be strong believers in the extreme claim that children shouldn't do chores at all. However, such a statement suffers from both logical and factual fallacies, and it should be examined meticulously. Accordingly, I, without hesitation, advocate that it's necessary for children to participate in chores. I feel this way for two reasons.
First of all, it's beneficial for children's development, as these chores require kids to master certain life skills. To be clear, having a better understanding of how to do chores will improve their independence and have long-term benefits in their future lives. Furthermore, in the long term, when they have to leave school and live by themselves, the knowledge of cooking or cleaning allows them to have better control of their lives, as they can cook and clean for themselves without relying on other people. It helps them to form a perfect balance between life and work.
Second, the fact that kids are inclined to be more grateful for their parents' work indicates that we should require them to do household. Take the case of myself, I used to be the typical kid who know nothing about the hardness of doing chores, however, when my mom persuaded me to do these chores with her, I started to understand how much effort one has to devote to give family members a nice life condition. Thus I become more grateful for my parents. Had it not been for my mother's persuasion, I would never realize all the effort and learned to appreciate their hard work.
Nevertheless, a voice arises that children can have extra time to study and enable them to have better grades if they are free from chores. Ironically, life is a long journey and academic performance is not everything. More time to study can help them pass exams but does not help them to live independently in this world. Therefore, allowing them to do chores is the true solution for children's development.
Considering all the examples and arguments given above, we can safely say that doing chores can provide more benefits for children because it enables children to learn certain skills and make them grateful for their parents.
- It is more beneficial for people to stop reading or listening to the news for a few days because there are too many news stories around the world 70
- Some students prefer to attend a small university Others prefer to attend a big university Discuss the advantages of each Then indicate which type of university you prefer Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 73
- Doing which activity do you think can better help you strengthen the friendship between you and your friend having a good time together with your friend solving your friend s problem with him or her 90
- It is more beneficial for people to stop reading or listening to the news for a few days because there are too many news stories around the world 70
- Describe an object that is very special in your life Explain why this object is important to you Include details and examples in your explanation 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 482, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...vers in the extreme claim that children shouldnt do chores at all. However, such a state...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 413, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...e family members a nice life condition. Thus I become more grateful for my parents. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, thus, as to, i feel, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2131.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 433.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92147806005 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67645416921 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531177829099 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6169118316 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.55 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.65 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280639917831 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802903596323 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474443780948 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152512105093 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457304217097 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.