There is a controversial debate on the amount of money governments should spend on arts and athletics. Some groups of people hold the view that it is better support athletics. other groups have an opposite view, and feel that it is more rewarding to support arts. From my vintage point, I am more inclined with the latter option.
Firstly, governments which supports arts bring cultural heritage to its people. A heritage is the accumulation of cultural values that we inherited from our ancestors. It can be agricultural, technological, or architectural. Unlike athletics who get support from private organization, art needs the support of the government. A vivid example is the architectural inheritance of the ancient buildings and sculpture of michel angelo in Florence. Confidently, The Italian government has capitalized on these huge cultural values to make Italy one the most artistic attractive destination to visitors . As a result, tourists come to visit Italy from all over the world to enjoy arts.
Secondly, governments capitalize on art work in return for financial rewards. Capitalizing on athletics may bring some rewards, However, art support is more rewarding. Popular artistic places attract tourists from all over the world, which makes it a gold mine for governments. In other words, governments can make money from supporting art work, However, this might not be necessarily true for athletics. For instance, the government of Italy generate millions of dollars from tourists who visit Italy to enjoy it's artistic places. Thus, governments not only create a cultural attraction, but also ensure a continuous supply of money to support its projects.
Although the aforementioned reasons are first to cross my mind at a glance, they are by no means the only reasons to hold my viewpoints. In fact, There is a further subtle point which is The trustworthy, refreshingly, intelligently study which was published in the archaeology journal which showed a preference for governments to support art work. This study enrolled 120 governments from all over the world to avoid bias.
To wrap up, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that governments should invest in arts more than athletics. If they did so, then we will a witness a whole new generation who does not only love arts, but adore it.
- The world’s forests are facing increasing pressure which, if left unchecked, will threaten the health of many industries, economies, nations, and lives. The development of an international fund to help developing countries implement useful conservation 73
- People learn in different ways. Some people learn by doing things, other people learn by reading about things, others learn by listening to people talk about things.Which of these methods of learning is best for you? Use specific examples to support your 70
- Essay topics: TPO-29 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors.Use specific reasons and examples to support your a 73
- At the end of the Triassic period 200 million years ago, there was a mass-extinction event that caused the extinction of more than half of all living species. It was this extinction event that allowed dinosaurs to become the dominant species for the next 75
- At the end of the Triassic period 200 million years ago, there was a mass-extinction event that caused the extinction of more than half of all living species. It was this extinction event that allowed dinosaurs to become the dominant species for the next 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Other
...ew that it is better support athletics. other groups have an opposite view, and feel ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: VINTAGE_POINT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'vantage point'?
Suggestion: vantage point
...more rewarding to support arts. From my vintage point, I am more inclined with the latter opt...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 597, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...istic attractive destination to visitors . As a result, tourists come to visit Ita...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for instance, in fact, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1974.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.264 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07781144134 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554666666667 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3033381505 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7272727273 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0454545455 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86363636364 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246027614842 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773115655875 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687846048957 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141590445122 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480967388542 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.