Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
I am absolutely agreed. The art is the reflection of the spiritual condition of a society. If the governments are to have an active society with delicate behavioral patterns, they should not take the artists for granted. There are some reasons that support my opinion as follows:
First of all, youths like art and at the onset of their self-recognition, they will try to learn a special art, such as music, painting etc. I mean the dependency between young people and the arts is indispensable and no one can ignore it. Governments, as the responsible for all of the people and their leisure time, should pay enough attention to the people who want to make their life more colorful, just bay learning an art. The authorities, governmental organizations, have payed ample attention to the athletics and it is the turn of the arts.
How the majority of the people can take advantages of an activity or national budgets? A proper answer to this question is the second reason. Investing on athletics, for instance Olympic caravans or world championships, would not be useful for the vast range of the people. The capitals could serve them better than the athletics. Moreover, neither a person learn an art properly or doing it just for fun, the interaction between him or her and the arts would affect the ethics and the life expectancy well. When its come to me, if I wanted to entrench the necessity of this issue and change the mindsets of the authorities, I would ask the beginner question. So spending money to improving the arts and cultivating them could be useful for all of the people, in contrast, spending money to developing athletics would be good just for athletes.
The last reason, is that the people got used to considering public aspects of the any investigation. They are so critical and are to challenge the governments. Assigning money to the arts increases the popularity of the government. So spending money for this important issue is turned to a flagship for the government by the community trends and its mentalities.
All in all, I do not mean that the athletics are not useful; They can fill leisure time of many people and excite them. But in comparison with the arts, they do not deserve such a huge budget.
- Why go to university? 3
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.•Wait until the class or meeting 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO 43 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 277, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...it. Governments, as the responsible for all of the people and their leisure time, should p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 742, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...nd cultivating them could be useful for all of the people, in contrast, spending money to ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, so, well, for instance, i mean, in contrast, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1858.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80103359173 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84191680555 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532299741602 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.557441419 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.35 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174799642402 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482486276843 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522043762085 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0975620848242 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562658644455 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.