Nobody can deny the fact and the truth that education plays a vitally important role in every person's life, and it is considered quite critical and crucial. Moreover, it is a worldwide known that education is a key factor that formulates of all human beings. Based upon all the conducted statistics, studies and research, one may states that studying history and literature take priority over studying science and math. Actually, heading out of all my own experience and observations, I am totally convinced that studying science and math is better than studying history and literature. I feel this way for so many varied and different reasons.
First, science and math are more valuable than history and literature because knowledge of math and science is necessary for understanding and advancing technology. Technology has led this world to become extremely interconnected. In addition, I believe that the internet, cell phones, and airplanes are all technological advances; they will not be possible without students of math and science inventing them. Take a China as an example, they mix the plastic waste with asphalt and use it to pave new roadways. If students do not continue to learn math and science, more technologies of the future like this one will be never created.
Secondly, the subjects of science and math are more interested than history and literature because students work with living things such as insects and plants. More than that, they discover strange facts. A small example may give light to this point. For instance, there are some insects live for one day or others have one eye. Furthermore, the subjects of math make students think and create new theories. Take a space as an example; we cannot discover Moon, Mars, space and so on without math.
Heading out of all previously mentioned discussion, I can sum up and conclude that science and math take precedence over history and literature because science is more valuable and due to the fact that math is more interesting.
- TPO49-Humpback whales 60
- TOEFL T P O 47 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet. Th 73
- TOEFL T P O 22 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- Do you agree or disagree with this following statement? A four-day workweek benefits than a five-day workweek.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...plays a vitally important role in every persons life, and it is considered quite critic...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 614, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[8]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put between 'will' and 'be'.
Suggestion: will never be
...echnologies of the future like this one will be never created. Secondly, the subjects of sc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, i feel, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 13.8261648746 203% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 52.1666666667 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 332.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06626506024 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74926585959 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545180722892 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6073132916 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9411764706 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5294117647 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64705882353 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260268807233 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778884495039 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067141914927 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158929665854 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344894876598 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.