Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Even if technology advanced to that level when people can earn money without going out, majority travels to their work place regularly. Personally, I believe that country income should be managed to improve transportation. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in following essay.
First of all, transportation issue is more spread throughout our country than lack of internet connection. Public transport in our country consists of regular buses and trolleybuses, but most abundant on the roads are minibuses, which are uncomfortable and have small capacity. It is especially noticeable in the mornings when all the people rush to get to their destination. Because of big number of passengers and small spaciousness of minibuses, they get really dense and road to work turns into torture. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. This summer I have attended the courses, which started at nine in the morning, for a month. Every day I was struggled to get to my destination, because conditions were unacceptable. It was hot and crowded inside that minibus, which I have taken every day. It was only one month; however, plethora of people face with such problem every day. That is why government should direct finances to enhance transportation.
Secondly, roads are crushed and it cause struggle to move inside the city. Roadworks are done rarely and highways left damaged; moreover, when eventually correction of roadways occurs, it is done with cheap materials which will not last for long. For instance, make up highways between cities was done two years ago, and now it is full of cracks and holes. Actually, it would serve for additional two years, but low quality of materials used shortened its exploitation time.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that political power of our country should invest money to public transportation. This is because low conditions of transport used and horrible situation of the roads.
- In 1995 a microscopic fungus called phytophthora ramorum, or P. ramorum, was first detected in the forests of the western United States. P. ramorum infects trees and causes particularly serious damage in oak trees: in many infected oaks, leaves wither rap 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now. 81
- TPO-50 - Integrated Writing Task: Scientists are considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars in the coming decades. Although there have been successful manned missions to the Moon in the 1960s and 1970s, Mars is 150 times further away from Earth 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 70
- Discuss a significant issue in your home country about which you are passionate and describe how you would use the education you obtain at our institution, American University (AU), Washington, DC, to create positive civic and social change once you retur 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 36, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'causes'?
Suggestion: causes
...n. Secondly, roads are crushed and it cause struggle to move inside the city. Roadw...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1645.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 320.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.140625 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91847395643 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603125 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2537643162 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5789473684 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8421052632 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52631578947 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131618716358 0.236089414692 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0372023737512 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321530128537 0.0737576698707 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.079438338989 0.150856017488 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0173697602361 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.