It is not uncommon that more and more people are going to have access to Internet. Therefore, it's not strange that some people claim that giving money to improve Internet access is more important than to improve public transportation. As far as I am concerned, both choices have their unique advantages that can by no means be surpassed by the other. It is too rash to label either of them as the superior and more beneficial choice.
On the one hand, the Internet has become the one of the most important technologies, which is used widely. In search for academic or professional information, having a remote business conversation or chatting overseas, all of them rely on the Internet, which makes impossible ideas in the past come true. To be specific, the Internet has penetrated every aspect of our daily life. In the morning, when you get up, you might check out the schedule on the Internet. Afterwards, you could pay for a bill online to take taxis to school or office. During studying or working, you probably need to search for corresponding information on the Internet. Before going to the sleep, you may regularly browse your email box for a while. Therefore, the Internet has been severed as a necessary element for a vast majority of people. Thus, for the sake of the convenient and exciting world the Internet created, we are supposed to place emphasis on the Internet.
On the other hand, public transportation is related to cities' economy, reputation and people's satisfaction. Generally, modern cities, especially international metropolis, have the well-maintained and highly developed traffic system, which can largely boost office workers' work efficiency and improve citizens' convenience. Only in this case can people left a good impression on these cities. Shanghai is a case in point. There are twelve subway lines, transporting almost ten million people per day. Over twenty-four million people live and work here and every year Shanghai continually attracts lots of visitors from all around the world. Without well run public transportation, great chances are that people have countless complains and as a result, economies of these cities would decline since tourists are unwilling to come here and native workers move out. Therefore, public transportation takes a significant role in cities' economy and reputation and people's satisfaction.
With reference to the argument above, there should be no absolute superiority of either one to the other. As far as I am concerned, improving Internet access and public transportation carries the same importance.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion which of the following is the best thing to do Interrupt and correct the mistake right away Wait until the class or meeting is 95
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives Use specific reasons and examples to su 59
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The opinions of celebrities such as famous entertainers and athletes are more important to younger people than they are to older people Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as a result, with reference to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2173.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 417.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21103117506 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96699191445 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568345323741 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 694.8 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1877077568 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4782608696 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1304347826 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239041704516 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650943303043 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750365110126 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148325658075 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716600517585 0.0645574589148 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.