Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Governments play a key role in the development of countries, and the majority of people thus intently consider the governmental organization. Some people claim that internet access should be improved by spending money from governments rather than public transportation systems. As far as I am concerned, I disagree with such a notion. I personally believe that public transportation is more significant to be developed by governments, and I will explore the reasons further in the subsequent paragraphs.
First and foremost, It is not everyone in cities can approach the internet, so public transportation is more essential to most people's daily life. Moreover, The improvement of transportation will be beneficial for many parts of society, such as education and the economy. For instance, according to research from the Thai Department of Transport, seventy percent of the Thai population from all walks of life use public transportation, while only thirty percent of those use the internet. Therefore, since the Thai government developed the Bangkok Skytrain systems, a plethora of Bangkokians have paid lower transportation costs. Furthermore, this development cuts down on traffic congestion in some areas and supports citizens to approach many facilities in cities. As you can see, if transportation is more efficient, it will provide a lot of benefits to cities and people.
Secondly, transportation is an integral part of the development of the tourism industry. To be specific, all domestic transport services interconnect cities together and accommodate not only citizens but also tourists. The more quality of transportation, the more tourist attraction. To illustrate this, When the Skytrain system was developed, a lot of tourists used this to commute around Bangkok. It helped tourists to commute easily and meet many places in the city. As a result, each year, Thailand has an enormous number of tourists from all over the world, so the Thai tourism industry provides the main income which is essential for the development of cities in Thailand. This also means that transportation supports the country to account for other developments.
In conclusion, I firmly maintain the belief that governments should provide a subsidy for public transportation more than internet access. This is due to the fact that public transport systems are beneficial to most people to have a better life, and they can improve the tourism industry and increase governments' income.
- Some people prefer to live in a small town Others prefer to live in a big city Which place would you prefer to live in Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A job with more vacation time but a low salary is better than a job with a high salary but less vacation time Use specific reasons to support your answer 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.0752688172 297% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2099.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45194805195 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22966516146 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52987012987 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2895936648 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.473684211 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2631578947 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36842105263 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282142855184 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0865630671598 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738291480501 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192218959773 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069029699238 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.