Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
I agree with the proposed statement. In my perspective, to keep old friends is more significant than making new friends. I think when I am a friend of many people it means that I am not close to any of my friends. I think anyone needs to have a close friend because sometimes our friend only can understand us. I assert that having Old friends have advantages than having new friends. Old friends know each other better, they are trusty and we can say very personal things to them.
For example, when I was in high school, I made a friend she was at my table and we saw each other every day. We were helping each other in solving and doing our assignments. We were together all the time in high school so we started to know each other, which makes us sad, happy, or angry. Especially I think at an early age people have a clear heart so they are more trusty and I can be sure that they do not lie as I and my friend did not. I was with my friend for many years, she knew many things about my life like my relationships, my successes so I can talk to her about my personal life.
In contrast, I made new friends when I got a job at a company. They are my friends and I love them but they knew me after I passed a critical period in my life so I can not speak with them about those times, not because they are not good or kind because I need to be understood while they do not know about many things in my life.
After all, making a friend is very important and we must be cautious who is our friend and who is not, because someones just pretend to be our friend and in the time they will harm us for jealousy or anything else.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | sonyeoso | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | Muggle1313 | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | Muggle1313 | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-14 | Mitra-T | 80 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | YAGUT | 75 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. 60
- In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States—birds in particular. Unfortunately for birds, these trends are likely t 40
- In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s not to suppress natural forest fires. The "let it burn" policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much damage. However, in the summer 60
- TPO35
- Although the sale of rhinoceros horns is illegal worldwide rhinoceroses Rhinos are commonly poached hunted illegally for their horns which can be sold for tens of thousands of dollars per kilogram Rhino horns are so valuable that one type of rhino is alre 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 312, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...imes our friend only can understand us. I assert that having Old friends have adv...
^
Line 1, column 483, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e can say very personal things to them. For example, when I was in high school, ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, after all, for example, i think, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1306.0 1977.66487455 66% => OK
No of words: 323.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.04334365325 4.8611393121 83% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24353343714 2.67179642975 84% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 212.727598566 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461300309598 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 409.5 618.680645161 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.538611393 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2857142857 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0714285714 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201643855897 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0985896774763 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732513368929 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140686694989 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0751721977731 0.0645574589148 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 58.1214874552 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 6.45 10.9000537634 59% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.39 8.01818996416 80% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 86.8835125448 38% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.