Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
By and large, it is established beyond doubt that having friends in life is very important. In this regard, making new friends in your life is of paramount importance. There has been no shortage of debates among scholars on whether keeping old friends is significant or making new friends. As for this writer's opinion, I subscribe to the idea of making new friends is essential but it doesn't mean I am not in favor of keeping new friends. In what follows, I will delve into the most crucial reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.
The first compelling reason corroborating my idea is that when you make new friends you have better opportunities to explore more in the world. It is worth mentioning that when you are in a new place sometimes it's necessary to make new friends. It is notable that when you meet new people you like some new people and they become your friend.
The second rationale behind my opinion is rooted in the fact that when you have new friends you have a different and new perspective about situations in life. It is crystal clear that sometimes a person has some problems in life where they need a second and different opinion. As a case in my mind, when I had to take admission to college I was confused between two colleges. There I met a girl who was very friendly and we had a conversation she became my friend. She helped me to make decisions by telling me the advantages of that specific college.
B pursuing the above paragraphs, one cam infers that although my choice is better. For the sake of brevity, a couple of points are worth reiterating: first, new friends help you to explore more. Secondly, new friends can give you new opinions. As for the writer's advice, I vehemently urge people to make new friends in new places. By doing so you can enjoy your life more.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | sonyeoso | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | Muggle1313 | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | Muggle1313 | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-14 | Mitra-T | 80 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | YAGUT | 75 | view |
- One theory holds that the Chaco structures were purely residential with each housing hundreds of people Supporters of this theory have interpreted Chaco great houses as earlier versions of the architecture seen in more recent Southwest societies In partic 80
- Humans have long been fascinated by elephants the largest land animal in the modern world Social animals that live in herds elephants are native to both Africa and Asia Their large ears long trunk and long life span have made elephants one of the most cap 80
- At universities and colleges sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support 73
- Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile s main source of power the internal combustion engine By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hydrogen based fuel cell engine which 80
- The Salton Sea in California is actually a salty inland lake The level of salt in the lake s water what scientists call its salinity has been increasing steadily for years because the lake s water is evaporating faster than it is being replaced by rainfal 81
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 303, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...cant or making new friends. As for this writers opinion, I subscribe to the idea of mak...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 386, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... making new friends is essential but it doesnt mean I am not in favor of keeping new f...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... when I had to take admission to college I was confused between two colleges. The...
^^
Line 4, column 255, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...s can give you new opinions. As for the writers advice, I vehemently urge people to mak...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, as for, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 324.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56481481481 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62249619305 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515432098765 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0257091486 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.1666666667 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.45110844103 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339710313529 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123333862868 0.076458572812 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777076413699 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232611614593 0.150856017488 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612053523102 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.87 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 86.8835125448 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 303, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...cant or making new friends. As for this writers opinion, I subscribe to the idea of mak...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 386, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... making new friends is essential but it doesnt mean I am not in favor of keeping new f...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... when I had to take admission to college I was confused between two colleges. The...
^^
Line 4, column 255, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...s can give you new opinions. As for the writers advice, I vehemently urge people to mak...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, as for, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 324.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56481481481 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62249619305 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515432098765 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0257091486 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.1666666667 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.45110844103 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339710313529 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123333862868 0.076458572812 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777076413699 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232611614593 0.150856017488 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612053523102 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.87 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 86.8835125448 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.