Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to read or watch the news presented by people whose views are similar to your own than by people whose views are different from yours.
Throughout history, news has played a prominent role in all societies. Due to it is paramount importance, researcher finds different ways to benefit analysis of the news. A controversial question which is often raised this idea whether people tend to listen to the news with a person who has the same viewpoint with them or listen to the news with people who has the opposite viewpoint. I personally contend that if people listen or watch the news with people who have opposite viewpoints with them, they have advantageous points; therefore, I disagree with this proposal. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons.
The first exquisite factor to be mentioned is that people who watch news by a person whose views are opposite can better analysis of these periodical events. To elaborate on my point, since a group of people listen to the news with the opposite viewpoint, they can better analyse the news. In this situation, people try to defend own ideas so that they propper strong reasons; hence, the people who can show strong reasons if they have up_to_ date information. I think online information needs a lot of study around the issue so that these people try to improve their information by many ways such as studying different books, website, listen to the podcast and many similar items and situation. Therefore, a person who has benefit information can better analysis news. A significant example that strikes in my mind about my own experience. when I was a student, I decided to contribute to argumentation which about important news. Therefore, I had to study different books, website and many other resources. I think that this situation helped me to provoke my information because I wanted to discuss with people who had a different viewpoint.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that if people watch the news with another person who has opposite their view they can learn how to defend their idea and tolerate opposing viewpoints. To shed more light on this matter, inasmuch as the group of people listen to the news, they learn how to tolerate opposite view. In other words, in this situation, people have indulged situation that learns how to listen to different viewpoint carefully and analysis this view. Also, these people learn how to control their anger and stress. I think this is a paramount skill in this world. Beyond a shadow of a doubt, people who become flourishing and successful person that control their angry and tolerate the opposite viewpoints.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that the best ways for listening to the news are listening with the person who has the opposite viewpoint. I believe that the people who watch the news with a group of people not only can better analyse the news but also learn some important skill such as how to locate opposite viewpoint and control their anger.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-06 | theprasad | 70 | view |
| 2021-11-17 | ShayesteTR | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-12 | JoeyRussell07 | 90 | view |
| 2021-11-11 | JoeyRussell07 | 90 | view |
| 2021-11-11 | JoeyRussell07 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 842, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...kes in my mind about my own experience. when I was a student, I decided to contribut...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, so, therefore, i think, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 27.0 11.0286738351 245% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2449.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 494.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95748987854 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64733449174 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.410931174089 0.524837075471 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 747.0 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1318667131 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.318181818 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4545454545 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.45454545455 5.45110844103 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257793664101 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867835756922 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572104312778 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177832162739 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249420465098 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.