Every human being has different characteristics of their own. While many people may be humorous, others who lack this sense of humor enjoy other traits, such as intelligence. I firmly believe that having smart friends and communicating with them is more beneficial than different types of personalities since we can take advantage of their companionship in both educations and job.
First of all, smart people can help their friends with their education. Since they are clever enough to understand lessons quickly, they are a better option for assisting their peers in study groups. They can guide other pupils because of their high-capacity brain when the teachers are not available. My personal experience is a suitable example of it. When I was an undergraduate student, I always had difficulties with math-related courses. I had a friend who was brilliant in mathematics. I managed to get a decent grade at one of my math courses after he taught me how to solve questions. If I had not used his ability in learning and teaching, I could not have passed that course. This example indicates how significant it is to be accompanied by an intelligent friend.
In addition to education issues, talented people can help us tackle our job problems as well. There are piles of paperwork and items in offices, which cannot be done without the assistance of an intelligent co-worker. Being smart makes them do their job faster than other employees, thriving and progressing quickly. So, they can lend us a hand once we are behind in work and increase our productivity. For instance, last month at my office, when I had to stay for a few hours longer than usual to finish my paperwork, one of my colleagues, an intelligent one, left the office for his home even earlier than average. The next day I asked him if he could help me with that work. He immediately accepted and let us get our job done so fast that we did not have to stay for a long time. That shows how useful intelligent people can be as a co-worker.
To sum it up, I subscribe to the idea that I appreciate being in a company of a smart friend, rather than a hilarious one. That is because their cleverness helps us not only in our educations but also in occupations.
- Agree or disagree Working slow and correctly or working fast and risk making mistakes 66
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 70
- Parents involved with their children s education 60
- The ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school 76
- Agree DisagreeMovies and TV programs have more negative effects than negative effects on the way young children behave 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...panionship in both educations and job. First of all, smart people can help thei...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... accompanied by an intelligent friend. In addition to education issues, talente...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...elligent people can be as a co-worker. To sum it up, I subscribe to the idea th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, well, while, for instance, in addition, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1839.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 390.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71538461538 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87245985891 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.0149388225 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.5909090909 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7272727273 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207747779101 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568218606633 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526203216353 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124822490208 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510185444965 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.