A glance at people's attitude toward leadership positions brings to the light a question that has been asked several times, namely, whether leadership comes naturally or one can acquire the qualifications of being an outstanding leader. Although some people assert that intrinsic abilities make a person commander, I, as a vice president of healthcare committee at Georgia State University, believe that people study management skills and become a reliable boss. My opinion is based on recent studies and my professional experience in related positions.
The foremost reason why I am supporting this idea lies in the fact that a manager needs to know specific skills which is not related to his personality. In U.S.A. most top MBA programs teach students essential information about business and related softwares to handle the difficult situation. During master education, the first important lesson that I learned was that we need different people with different perspectives and characteristics to get good results. For example, an optimistic person speak about procedure and outcome, while a pessimistic person consider risks and failure. Balance of diverse thoughts move a company forward. Therefore, there is no right or wrong intrinsic talent for leadership.
Another subtle point that I should deem is the fact that people with great motivations remove the barrier and accomplish their goals such as being an executive manager.To study MBA, one of the important requirements is to speak English fluently. I think that it was the hardest challenge in my life that I have experienced. But, since I was really interested to continue my education in administration field, I did my best to improve my English presentation. As a matter of fact, none of my aptitude could help me if I did not want to adjust myself to the new situation. Thus, positive incentives encourage people to achieve their dream.
Admittedly, some people have natural talents which assist them to pass this way easier. Definitely, a shy person has to work harder on himself to be eligible for leadership and he must compete with a persuasive person who understand how to negotiate. I agree that it is not fair, but it does not mean that obtaining knowledge is impossible. Nevertheless, I dare to say, if somebody could not become an excellent manager, it is his own fault, and should not blame nature.
Due to the aforementioned argument explored in the previous statements, I highly recommend enthusiastic people not to confine themselves in the boundaries of natural talents and follow their dreams.
- It is sometimes said that borrowing money from a friend can harm or damage the friendship. Do you agree? Why or why not? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer. 70
- In order to attract more tourists the government could either improve safety by hiring more police or improve its appearance by repairing old buildings and streets Which way do you think is more effective 68
- Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to 88
- 71 Which would you choose a high paying job with long hours that would give you little time with family and friends or a lower paying job with shorter hours that would give you more time with family and friends Explain your choice using specific reason 93
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements Because people are busy doing so many different things they do very few things well Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
...oals such as being an executive manager.To study MBA, one of the important require...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, nevertheless, really, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, for example, i think, such as, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2165.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21686746988 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01314293359 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61686746988 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 684.9 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5684585847 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.947368421 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8421052632 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47368421053 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130002008256 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.031618726115 0.076458572812 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422482396201 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.066595300714 0.150856017488 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0217490212887 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.