Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The most serious problems in the world will be solved during my lifetime. Use details and examples to support your answer.
There are a lot of people who support the idea that someone won’t solve the most dangerous problems in the world during their lifetime. However, I personally disagree with the statement that I can’t see the situation that the most serious problems today are disappeared. I have several reasons that uphold my view.
To begin with, the technological development helps us to change the current situation. Put differently, new technologies can provide us the solutions to reduce the harmful objects. For instance, the widespread use of the electronic cars that don’t emit gas is essential factor to improve this hopeless circumstance. Nowadays, however, most of the cars we ride use gasoline as energy to move. Thus, the huge amount of gas is created in our daily lives when we drive our car to commute, go on a trip and purchase all over the world. To change this situation, most car companies try to invent electronic cars that don’t burn gasoline and not emit any harmful gas during driving. Indeed, the number of users of this new model of cars is limited because the new products are too expensive for everyone to get, but few decades after the price of the cars will be down and we can enjoy them easily. After decreasing the price, the old type of cars will be replaced by the new ones. Therefore, the technological advantages will create the clean air.
In addition to this, the huge countries start to struggle with the difficulties these days. To more specific, the news reports a new treaty that decides to reduce the CO2 emissions is agreed by most of the countries all around the world. For instance, a few years ago some developing countries didn’t agree the rules that limits the industrial activities and the leaders of these countries continued their economic development with providing a host of gas that causes greenhouse effects. Nonetheless, developed countries have tried to persuade developing countries again and again because some islands has been at a critical situation due to high sea level. After persistent persuasion, some great developing countries such as China and India signed the agreement in order to save the environment. Hence, the amount of CO2 will decrease in near future.
Considering the reasons I mentioned in the paragraphs above, it is my conclusion that the most serious obstacles in the world will be solved during my lifetime.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-09 | h.salehi | 76 | view |
| 2022-01-09 | h.salehi | 76 | view |
| 2021-10-07 | Mariam Omar | 76 | view |
| 2021-10-07 | Mariam Omar | 76 | view |
| 2021-07-30 | ChiuYuan | 60 | view |
- Some charitable organizations allow people who give money to charity to choose how their donation will be used If you were give money to charity would you prefer to choose how your donation is going to be used or do you think it is more effective to leave 57
- If your friends want to change their lifestyle to achieve a positive lifestyle which of the following suggestions would you recommend 1 Be more disciplined and have a stronger will 2 Work with people who share the same goals 3 Consult a professional exper 60
- If your friends want to change their lifestyle to achieve a positive lifestyle which of the following suggestions would you recommend 1 Be more disciplined and have a stronger will 2 Work with people who share the same goals 3 Consult a professional exper 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People should keep trying to reach their goals even if they seem impossible to achieve Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Overall the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today s world 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in addition, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1988.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 399.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98245614035 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73864776518 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543859649123 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3229371375 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.631578947 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68421052632 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218176843873 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681927312255 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753881716744 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179681253803 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106729078386 0.0645574589148 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.