Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The most serious problems in the world will be solved during my lifetime. Use details and examples to support your answer.
Some people state that the world will be saved in the future because there will exist better technologies capable of bring benefits to humans and they will be able conform well with such technologies. However, others think otherwise. They believe that the world will be saved during their life time because they are going to produce technologies good enough to solve the world's snags. In my opinion, the world's hindrances will be solved in the future because there is going to be better technologies that will be extremely good to help humans to solve those drawbacks. I feel this way as I will discuss in this article.
First of all, in the future there is not going to exist any issues with pollution because electric cars will be develop and everyone will pursue one. For example, there are many companies around the world that are already contending who will be developing those electric cars first. General Electric is among the companies that are producing prototypes to see the possibility of devising them and, it is certainly believed that with those electric cars, pollution will no longer be a threat to the environment, then one of the biggest problem to the world will be solved. Therefore, this example elucidates that merely in the future one of the world's problems will be over.
Moreover, another threat to the world that it will be solved in the future is the global warming. For the later there will be many sorts of technologies capable enough to fight it or , even, to ebb it in a way that it will no long exist anymore. For instance, in Brazil, one of my professors is leading a team of scientists to seek solutions to storage CO2 under the soil. He stated that thirty years from now there is going to be possible to do that because kinds of technologies will appear to better help them with this issue. Thus, this instance clarifies that sheer in the future the global warming drawback will be solved.
Finally, I strongly believe that only in the future technologies will come to fight pollution and global warming and then the world's hindrances will be solved.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-01-09 | h.salehi | 76 | view |
2022-01-09 | h.salehi | 76 | view |
2021-10-07 | Mariam Omar | 76 | view |
2021-10-07 | Mariam Omar | 76 | view |
2021-07-30 | ChiuYuan | 60 | view |
- The claim that animals have rights has been subjected as a matter of debate since the 1970's. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? Should zoos be banned? 55
- The most important investment that can be made to the education of children aged four to seven is giving them a computer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents are the best teachers Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion? Support it with personal examples…. 55
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents are the best teachers Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 290, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...at the world will be saved during their life time because they are going to produce techn...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...chnologies capable enough to fight it or , even, to ebb it in a way that it will n...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, i feel, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1725.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7520661157 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49007661006 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.440771349862 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 540.9 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6041012757 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.93333333333 5.45110844103 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247647655989 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105836078782 0.076458572812 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572083967316 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168898909339 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412455523274 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.