Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
From my perspective, there are more positive effects than negative effects of movies and televisions on young people.
To begin with, watching movies and televisions can cultivate audiences' sympathy. Sympathy is the ability to have emotional connections with others and can make people feel connected with the world and have the sense of belonging. Susan Sontag once said in the essay "the Decay of Cinema" that when audience are fully immersed into the plot of one movie, they can experience the larger experience of submerging themselves in lives that were not theirs and thus being kidnapped by the images. For example, when I watching The house that Jack Built, a masterpiece directed by Lars Von Trier, I can feel the despair, the isolation and the alienation which are transmitted via the cinema, and that experience is exactly the process of developing sympathy.
In addition, aesthetic consciousness can be developed through watching movies and televisions. Although there are numerous Hollywood blockbusters that have no artistic values and can only be "theme parks" as Martin Scorsese said in 2019, there are many cinemas that are true arts from The Breathless in the French Waves to A Hidden Life more recently. From watching those kinds of masterpieces, audience can learn director's unique aesthetics like Quentin Tarantino's violence aesthetics that is born from the violence and blood.
But I have to admit that there are critiques of mass media that media is a powerful force within society that can subvert essential norms and values and thus undermine the social order, and average people especially the youngsters are helpless and vulnerable to the manipulation power of media content. However, more recent scholars tend to use the theory of "catharsis" to defend the positive effects of mass media on young people. Viewing mediated aggression from TV shows or violent movie sates or reduces people’s natural aggressive drives. Also, viewers can learn that violence might not be appropriate in a given situation, and inclination toward aggression was inhibited by the information in the media presentation.
In a nutshell, as a form of art, the mass media including television and movies have more advantages than disadvantages towards young people.
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people Recently however archaeol 59
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society one must study its major cities 83
- Question Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage Humans have long been fascinated by elephants the largest land animal in the modern world Social animals that live i 80
- Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily Use specific reaso 73
- 3 Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 520, Rule ID: I_AM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I am'?
Suggestion: I am
...napped by the images. For example, when I watching The house that Jack Built, a m...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, for example, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1964.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 355.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5323943662 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20590607522 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571830985915 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.1344086022 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 123.437005047 48.9658058833 252% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 178.545454545 100.406767564 178% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.2727272727 20.6045352989 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180460436154 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906105944355 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105649520965 0.0737576698707 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147882498321 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119639321952 0.0645574589148 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.8 11.7677419355 177% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 58.1214874552 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 10.1575268817 167% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.39 10.9000537634 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.01818996416 128% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.0537634409 147% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 520, Rule ID: I_AM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I am'?
Suggestion: I am
...napped by the images. For example, when I watching The house that Jack Built, a m...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, for example, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1964.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 355.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5323943662 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20590607522 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571830985915 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.1344086022 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 123.437005047 48.9658058833 252% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 178.545454545 100.406767564 178% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.2727272727 20.6045352989 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180460436154 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906105944355 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105649520965 0.0737576698707 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147882498321 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119639321952 0.0645574589148 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.8 11.7677419355 177% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 58.1214874552 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 10.1575268817 167% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.39 10.9000537634 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.01818996416 128% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.0537634409 147% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.