It is hard to deny that some movies and television can teach young people various knowledge and such a fact leads impressionable people to generate that watching movies have a positive impact on youth's behaviors. However, such a statement suffers from both logical and factual fallacies, and it should be examined meticulously. As far as, physical health, psychology, and economic safety are concerned, I strongly hold that television has a negative influence on how young people are behaving.
First and foremost, watching movies are harmful to our body, as staring the screen for a long time will definitly hurt one's eyes. To be specific, my eyes cannot get sufficient relax when I am watching TV programs, which my eyes' pressure is much higher than usual. The frequent vary between eye's pressure should lead to several eyes diseases. Not to mention that after stoping watching television, teenagers can have more time to play with their friends or do exercise, which can enhance their ability to cooperate and can keep their shapes.
Futhermore, the fact that young people are easy to be lured by the advertisement indicates that it may increase the risk of getting cheated of their money online.Take the case of my cousin, John, who always watches movies or TV shows when he is in spare time. As his parents are busy with their work, they do not have time to take care of him. John was attracted by a toy advertisement being shown on the television and used my uncle's credit card to pay for it without my uncle's permission. As a result, my uncle discovered that he has an unrecognized money outflow after 3 weeks as he received a loan receipt from the bank. Had it not been for John lured by the advertisement from the TV show, he would never use his father's money to buy it without any permission.
Nevertheless, a voice arises that young people can get helps from movies and television for their future career development. Ironically, the fact that it is hard to distinguish movies that are favorable for the youth to watch as some of them contain violent scene that will damage young people's mental health against that gaining variety of knowledge from movies can let children to discover their interest. Therefore, teenagers' psychology may be harmed by watching movies.
In a nutshell, I maintain that young people who watch movies and television regularly may have a negative consequence rather than a positive one. Admittedly, as my favorite quote from James Madison goes, as long as the reason of man contributes fallible, different opinions will be formed, and some people opposes me. However, I believe they will compromise after being exposed to my article.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement At universities and colleges sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 3
- Do you agree or disagree it s better to take the most difficult or challenging classes in the university or college even if you will not get the good grades in them 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...een for a long time will definitly hurt ones eyes. To be specific, my eyes cannot ge...
^^^^
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Take
...f getting cheated of their money online.Take the case of my cousin, John, who always...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2232.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 452.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93805309735 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71415366548 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530973451327 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 697.5 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.6567752604 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1111111111 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171429427829 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057922444955 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595209574469 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108325993464 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448685935086 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.