Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Before tendering my opinion I guess I need to take quick glance on this argument on both sides. Some people agree that t.v and movies affect young people’s behavior in bad way. But, however, others believe that movies and television change young people’s life in properly way. I concur with the second group of people whose agree that movies and t.v. impact youngest in positively way because of numerous reasons why I subscribe the attitude elaborating cogently in the subsequent paragraphs.
First reason come to my mind consolidating my stand point is nowadays, technology influence people’s life all around the world. Also, watching movies and television raise the young people’s intelligent level, skills, and talents as well. For instance, one of my friends’ son was mentally retarded but he watched hundreds of movies and t.v shows and that solely affect his life by getting much better. In fact, people can choose what the best for their personality, character, and which kind of movies will raise their fundamental knowledge.
Second reason I need to give it some attention is that diversity become in our cultures and how people can adapt to live in foreign counties nationwide. These days, we can know any kind of news from just one finger press and that may changes young’s people life by watching what other young people suffering. Furthermore, that will influence their lives in great way and also will affect their behaviors and attitude. For example, my brother coincidence saw his best friend on the t.v news. Unfortunately, that guy lost his parents and his home because of the war in one of the countries. In fact, that changes my brother’s behavior because he felt what his friend’s feelings.
Additionally, parents consider young people’s mentors and leaders on this earth. Plethora of young people do exactly what their parents behave. Personally, my parents still advise me to watch what the best for me to get high scores in my college. And that influence my personality by getting high scores in my dental exams. All that because they advise me to watch dental procedure show on t.v. Many studies claimed that watching movies and t.v. increase the intellectual level and let people being more socialized and friendly.
To put it briefly, I strongly agree that technology makes our life much comfortable and easier than in the past. But young people should monitor their behavior when they are using technology and that’s can help them to improve critical thinking, and also breeds them better future in order that achieves acceptance in colleges. In a nutshell, in fact, there are multiplicity of other factors supplementing the aforementioned statements, which could be alluded here, but are not embraced due to the dearth of time
- The sea otter is a small mammal that lives in waters along the western coast of North America from California to Alaska. When some sea otter populations off the Alaskan coast started rapidly declining a few years ago, it caused much concern because sea ot 88
- 题目原文：Hail—pieces of ice that form and fall from clouds instead of snow or rain—has always been a problem for farmers in some areas of the United States. Hail pellets can fall with great force and destroy crops in the field. Over the last few 83
- TPO 43Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.•Wait until the class or m 73
- TPO 5-INTEGRATED WRITING ESSAY 3
- TPO 5-INTEGRATED WRITING ESSAY 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 517, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e not embraced due to the dearth of time
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, so, still, well, for example, for instance, i guess, in fact, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2369.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 455.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20659340659 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84802942147 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 708.3 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3450943315 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.681818182 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6818181818 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13636363636 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166683892526 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573835827712 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592779287333 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105116474761 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616010756384 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.