Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Modern days is called information era and there are a lot of sources that present this information. One of the popular types of information is news, which have different sources such as newspapers, the Interent, and TV. Some people prefer to get news from a specific sources. However, I prefer to use different sources because of two reasons.
First, some news resources present incorrect news. This news is for attract more audiences for increasing their revenue. For example, a while ago I saw a clipe about hitting a giant meteorite to the earth on Instagram. They claimed that this accident will be definite, and it would kill entire life on the earth because of its huge size and increddible speed. However, after a lot of search on the Internet and reading a lot scientific pages, I found that the news was fake, and the main porpuse of the clipe was to collect likes and followers. In sum, some news resources present incorrect news for attracting more viewers.
Second, Some news has a special porpuse. This news wants to increase popularity of a product, a person or company. So, writers exaggerate about them by signifying some aspect of them. For instance, a month ago I came across to lot of news about investing on stocks, in which the authors claimed that there is a lot of profits on it and you can earn a lot of money for a short time. So, I was almostly convinced to invest on stocks. But, for increasing my confident I decided to talk by a stockbroker who has great reputation on it. Finally, he told that the company related to stocks is breaking and its investors wants to gain their money by fraud amateur peoples. So, some news are a intentional porpuse.
All and all, I prefer to get information from different resources because some news are incorrect and some has a special porpuse. However, we can find trustworthy resources by examining them in a long period of time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-25 | minammah | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-25 | minammah | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-06 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2022-07-02 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2022-06-12 | nida fatima | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For success in a future job the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- TPO 33 Integrated Writing Task
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Others think access to much information creates problems Which view do you agree with Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 63
- sea otters TPO10
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Others think access to much information creates problems Which view do you agree with Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 684, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...raud amateur peoples. So, some news are a intentional porpuse. All and all, I pr...
^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ALL_AND_ALL[1]
Message: This phrase is nonstandard. Did you mean 'all in all' (=after all, nevertheless)?
Suggestion: All in all
..., some news are a intentional porpuse. All and all, I prefer to get information from diffe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 201, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...y resources by examining them in a long period of time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 217, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xamining them in a long period of time.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 334.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68263473054 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65841963418 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508982035928 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8068487796 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.2 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159695236199 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542827017469 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521380961 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117393359281 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545292415372 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.