Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In order to be well informed a person must get information from many different news resources Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

People need information to be able to make decision in their life. Some believe that source of informative news come from diverse media, while others disagree. Personally, I think It is more beneficial for everyone to consider different source of information in order to have a great information.

First of all, nowadays most of news outlets have the agenda to promote. In fact, if we focus on reading or watching the same media we will miss out on real reality. However, if we choose to compare what we learn from different source, we will be able to weigh and decide ourselves the reality. To illustrate thoroughly, in my country we have two different type of news one side promotes conservative’s agenda, while the second advocates for progressive plans. All sides try to paint their information based on their profits. As result, they mislead people who are loyal to them. In order to avoid these misleading, we can check both sides of information and weigh ourselves.

Secondly, best information come from diverse opinions, and receiving information from different views can help us understand other people opinion. We may have a one fixed view on some matter, as a matter of fact reading other type of news, we do that not to change our believes but to just understand how people who are different with us think and believe on the matter. If we choose this path, we can create a better society where we have to live together without conflict. Moreover, if people can understand other person felling, it is a big sign of living in harmony. For example, our society is very diverse, but we tend to isolate in our culture and most people don’t have friend from other society. Because of this, we will not be able to understand why they live the way they live. The best way to do is to learn from different news.

In conclusion, I strongly think that it is beneficial to read the information from different sources. This is because we can avoid being radicalized by the agenda of one source of news and because we can understand other people thinking

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-12-25 minammah 73 view
2022-12-25 minammah 73 view
2022-07-06 Hibahtabbaa 70 view
2022-07-02 Hibahtabbaa 60 view
2022-06-12 nida fatima 60 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user bijan54 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 9, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the best'.
Suggestion: , the best
...rmation and weigh ourselves. Secondly, best information come from diverse opinions,...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 270, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'beliefs' (noun) instead of believes (verb)?
Suggestion: beliefs
...e of news, we do that not to change our believes but to just understand how people who a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 679, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'friended'.
Suggestion: friended
... our culture and most people don’t have friend from other society. Because of this, w...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, in fact, as a matter of fact, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1712.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 358.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78212290503 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67688138598 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494413407821 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 547.2 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0624782623 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1052631579 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8421052632 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78947368421 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162554609192 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067378609907 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053709183189 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126059733796 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364959234672 0.0645574589148 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 86.8835125448 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.